Johnson & Bush... Vietnam and Vietnam II. Texas is the problem. Let's agree to keep Texans out of the White House forever. Deal?
2006-11-13 15:45:38 · 25 answers · asked by Good Times, Happy Times... 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, I agree. Let's give Texas back to the Mexicans.
2006-11-13 15:47:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Texans seem to be a problem with majority leaders as well, Delay. And energy companies, Enron. And our greatest president was killed in Texas.. Hmm And even bitchy cartoon characters on spongebob! Sandy Cheeks is from Texas.
2006-11-13 16:09:28 · answer #2 · answered by Rocketman 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Well after careful consideration The United States has decided to let Mexico have Texas after-all, on the grounds that they take Bush with them!
2006-11-13 19:51:44 · answer #3 · answered by M&M_89 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Vietnam II?
You're an idiot.
US Soldiers killed in Vietnam over 9 years = 63,000.
US Soldiers killed in Iraq in 4 years = 3,050.
There is no comparison between Iraq and Vietnam. Anyone who continues to draw those conclusions are CLUELESS about history. Try READING A BOOK and quit drinking the mainstream media Kool-Aid.
.
2006-11-13 16:09:16 · answer #4 · answered by nbasuperdupe 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Deal. 50 odd years of meddling from that neck of the woods has stunted American growth.
2006-11-13 16:18:12 · answer #5 · answered by GJ 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
OK now that I understand the way this game called yahoo answers is played here it goes. Don't mess with Texas, remember everything is bigger in Texas, including the cans of whoop ***. NO DEAL!!!!
2006-11-13 15:49:52 · answer #6 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
that's one republican who firmly believes that Paul has and nevertheless is sweet on the money concerning maximum subject concerns he has addressed. it is too undesirable the Bush administration further him in for suggestion on the top. they could have been listening to him the entire time and taking his suggestion heavily. he's have been given it superb in terms of the economic gadget. and that's for specific. despite the fact that a commodity based economic gadget could desire to pose a severe difficulty with a inhabitants length such as ours. save that throughout ideas human beings. that's why a "credit" based one is definitely a acceptable option, despite the fact that it does choose some severe regulatory shape put in place besides as being became over to the human beings extremely of a "chosen" handful. genuine and actual oversight additionally desires to be put in place besides. collectively as that's all going on, working a commodity based economic gadget in parallel with the present one does not be an extremely undesirable thought in any respect. that's a surprising thought........ Too undesirable it is so actual corrupted and used for administration of the lots. i could prefer to work out it became over to the human beings and oversight and audits of it controlled by using Congress merely(administered by making use of the GAO). specifically the U.S. residing house of Representatives. Any and all positions to run our economic gadget could be voted on "by making use of the human beings". not extra appointments to it by making use of any element of the government. removing of elected officers interior it is going to likely be the only accountability of the residing house of reps and any alternative could could desire to be voted on by making use of the human beings merely. An appointed individual could desire to be accomplished by making use of the U. S. residing house of reps(by using majority vote concerning "all contributors" merely) however the appointment could desire to final now not than 60 days as a manner to permit time for a particular election of a sparkling valid by making use of the human beings. words limits interior it may desire to be no extra desirable than 2 2year words no rely if consecutive or nonconsecutive by making use of anybody individual "elected" to the positions needed. it is going to be constitutionally amended and on no account infringed upon. using gold and siver coin could be for emergency circumstances merely. yet on no account to be taken remote from the human beings ever lower back. i think of maximum do not understand this although.
2016-10-17 06:14:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"yea, lets give texas back to mexico? " your economy and food supply would crumble without this great state. And the only true savior for this country has to come from the south. Your elitist northerns are causing the demise of this country. I just hope someone from the south comes along fast enough
2006-11-13 15:52:17 · answer #8 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 3⤊ 6⤋
No deal. Better policy: No Dems.
2006-11-13 17:12:02 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Bush is from Connecticut.
lol...he's STILL from Connecticut..that hasn't changed. Guess reading isn't a high priority for some folks.
And the thumbs keep on a comin...Pssst...still from Connecticut.
2006-11-13 15:47:50 · answer #10 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋