Maybe its true what rapper Kanye West said "George Bush doesnt like Black people" proven during Katrina and with the genocide going on in Darfur.
2006-11-13 15:22:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Most of your answers signal to me that not only is RACISM alive and well in America but also IGNORANCE!
2006-11-13 16:24:25 · update #1
how come they overlook veterans
2006-11-17 12:49:12 · answer #1 · answered by Talking Hat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Darfur has been overlooked by the world. The U.N. won't take any action. From what I've heard, the U.S. should keep its nose out of everybody else's business and stop trying to run the world. So why is it now our job to intervene in Darfur? By the way, there is oil there. That's pretty much why the Sudanese government has been persecuting the animists and Christians anyway. Oh, I'm terribly sorry. Please forgive me. I completely forgot that it's totally impossible to persecute Christians. Never mind.
2006-11-13 23:40:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kanye West is rapist and a liar. Ever hear of Collen Powell? Condie Rice? He is even cordial that moron Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpten. You are mistaken and you know it! And as for Darfur, the US can not take care of everybody. And Iraq was led by a hostile leader. One that took American hostages, and trained terrorists. Hey! Why don't you ask China or Russia to help? How about Hugo Chavez?
Get a life dude!
2006-11-13 23:34:33 · answer #3 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kanye West is ******* retard who grew up richer than President Bush did. He's a poser. Katrina was a failure of the Louisiana government. The governor and New Orleans mayor sure managed to evacuate in time.
Now for the actual question. Which is it? Are we supposed to leave other countries alone or are we supposed to help? We can't help and save every country on the planet. There's always some other country a person can point to, saying they need help, but America can't be everywhere.
2006-11-13 23:58:00 · answer #4 · answered by bennyjoe81 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Bush like black votes as well as white votes.
Like others stated, there is no oil in Darfur and Darfur is not a threat to USA.
2006-11-13 23:26:19 · answer #5 · answered by oskeewow13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darfur has no oil or other valuable resourses that are of interest to the USA. We also turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to the Rwanda crisis about 12 years ago. We seem to only "help" the areas that have something we want. I don't think Bush dislikes black people but he sure is clueless when it comes to their issues, concerns and well being. I give the ole jackass credit, he did show up to give a speech at the ground breaking of the Dr. King memorial.
2006-11-13 23:28:06 · answer #6 · answered by livingstonseagull43 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WOAH! It's Alec Baldwin! Or maybe Barbra Striesiend! Neato!
But if you call helping nations by pulling out and letting them go like rats off a sinking ship then that sucks.
And if George Bush didn't like black people what about Condi/Powel?
2006-11-13 23:46:42 · answer #7 · answered by JellyCat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is true, yet really with the help America offers (Iraq) No thank You. I cannot think of single country including Israel (Marshall Plan aside, but ultimately that brought capital flow from London to New York) America only helps for self help!
2006-11-14 00:23:07 · answer #8 · answered by mary57whalen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not that he doesn't like black people, there's just no oil in Darfur.
2006-11-13 23:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by jperk1941 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is impossible to help everywhere, so you must pick and choose who to help. If we went to darfur and ignored the middle east, people would say he doesn't like Arabians.
2006-11-13 23:34:06 · answer #10 · answered by Inquisitor 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No oil in Darfur, has nothing to do with race.
2006-11-13 23:24:34 · answer #11 · answered by Dane 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋