Yes, of course they do, there's no exception made for having other opportunities available. Examples are Roger Staubach and Phil McConkey, who was a WR for the NY Giants in the 1980s, after serving as a Navy Helicopter pilot.
There's been some sort-of exceptions for physical reasons though. The military actually has stricter physical standards than professional sports in some ways. So, Nap McCallum had a shortened navy commitment b/c knee surgery limited him to a non-combat officer career anyway (He then played for the Raiders and suffered a gruesome leg injury on TV.) In the NBA, Dave Robinson also had a shortened navy commitment, because he grew too tall while at the naval academy to be a combat officer.
2006-11-13 14:23:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by KevinStud99 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have seen one player who when to the NFL from the Air Force Academy. Think he was on the Steelers. I am not sure what the rules are that the military has for people who have a chance for the NFL.
2006-11-13 14:18:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jazzy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they can go to the NFL first.
For example:
Napoleon McCallum played in 1986 for the Los Angeles Raiders while splitting duty with the United States Navy before having to spend his 5-year commitment with the Navy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_McCallum
2006-11-13 14:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ezgoin92 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have to serve in the reserves for what I believe is 6 years. They've relaxed a little bit on it - they had to serve 4 years active after graduation.
2006-11-13 14:59:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Boof 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm almost positive that they have to serve 2 years after graduation. i think they mentioned that this year when i was watching the navy-airforce game
2006-11-13 14:18:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by That Guy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they are committed to serve
2006-11-13 14:24:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
their duty to their country comes first
2006-11-13 14:39:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋