English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think that scientists should study natural substances. We need to invest both time and money in creating better uses for is natural resources, such as other heating/cooling solutions. These solutions can offer the same as or better results than there are already available. For example, the use of corn and soybeans as a gasoline preservative shows promise for reducing fossil fuels which will make the country safer and cleaner. There is a huge environmental impact of natural things, since synthetic takes more time to decompose. For Example things like plastic can kill animals that think it is food.

I really need an ending on this and some tips to make it better since its not that great. Its about how scientist should study natural not synthetic substances. I need atleast one more sentence so its long enough for requirments.

2006-11-13 13:38:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Homework Help

3 answers

If I were to make any revisions to this.. this is what I would do.

I think scientists should study natural substances. We need to invest both time and money in creating better uses for our natural resources, such as better heating and cooling solutions. These solutions can offer the same, if not better results than are already available. For example; the use of corn and soybeans as a gasoline preservative shows promise for reducing fossil fuels, which will make the country safer and cleaner.
There is a huge environmental impact on natural things, since synthetic products take more time to decompose. These products are not only polluting our Earth, but also killing animals at the same time. Animals that are scavengers that hunt for food don’t know not to eat these things, in result they may end up dying from eating some of these plastic objects.
I really believe that the time and money that would be spent on this research, would be very beneficial to us all. Our world would be a cleaner, safer, and much healthier place to live in. Who doesn’t want that? Now all we’ve got to do is make this happen.


I hope that helps, good luck.

2006-11-13 14:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by sic_twisted_me 2 · 0 0

No, I didn't like Charlie's Angels, Dynasty, Starsky and Hutch, Beverly Hills 90210, Melrose Place, The Love Boat, Fantasy Island, Vega$, Hart to Hart, The Colbys, T.J. Hooker, 7th Heaven, Charmed, and S.W.A.T. Yuck they all suck. So I guess I can pick on Spelling. Now, as for gramma, I have to ask, what do you want, good gramma or good taste? A gramma that tastes good? Heavens to dentures, I hope she has convertible debentures.

2016-03-28 04:52:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How about a quick summary that will also reinforce your theme?

At the end, you might want to mention the vast strides in manufacturing since many products have been made in plastic, (cars, toys, tools, etc.) but then use an adverse statement to its hazards. While we enjoy the lightweight, low cost of plastic products, we are faced with the problem of appropriate disposal, animal endangerment (your thought) and Eco-friendly decomposition. Recycling is only a solution if we are participate...not everyone does.

A summary also wraps your paper up neatly and reinforces your mission statement.

2006-11-13 14:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by joe_on_drums 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers