no skin .. because it isn't healthy for the heart ... even though the taste is to die for .. still .. the fat that the skin has on the chi ken contains as much fat as the whole chicken itself ..
2006-11-13 21:06:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by jack jack 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Skin
2006-11-13 14:22:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by pinkcasperartweety 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Skin!! That's the best part of the fried chicken. I'm like Cartman in that one episode of South Park where he eats all the skin off of every piece of chicken and just leaves the meat in the bucket.
2006-11-13 13:40:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Skin!
2006-11-13 13:38:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd like to pretend that I'm all about the health benefits and say "Definitely NO skin...." but, nah....if it's fried, it's got to have skin.
2006-11-13 13:40:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Skin. Skinless fried chicken is for loonies.
2006-11-13 13:38:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by united9198 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
skin
2006-11-13 13:40:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No fried chicken- Too much hydrogenated oils. Baked skinless chicken if done right is good.
2006-11-13 13:38:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sgt Squid 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
skin
2006-11-13 13:38:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
skin
2006-11-13 13:37:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by FunBetty! 6
·
1⤊
1⤋