2006-11-13 12:53:08 · 15 answers · asked by jamaican babe 7 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Well obviously wrestlers like HHH and Cena get more money than Sting and Styles. But Samoa Joe and Cage prolly make more money than wrestlers like Matt Hardy and CM Punk. Obviously WWE would be able to offer better money to a better wrestler than TNA could. But like others have said, the work load is much more. Most wrestlers in the WWE have to pay for their own hotels and plane tickets. Since TNA is still only shot in one place, hotels and plane tickets are not such a problem.
2006-11-13 14:40:29 · answer #1 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA pays about the same because they can pay their wrestlers what ever they want because they are funded by a Billion-Dollar company so they can do what they want and TNA is better then WWE according to votes.
2006-11-14 07:54:30 · answer #2 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uncle Vinnie Mac pays all of his workers a $250,000 signing bonus and a minimum of $2,300 per week whether he works them or not. That works out to $369,600 the first year and $119,600 every year after that.
There is no way TNA can compete.
2006-11-13 20:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by Bradly S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes tna sucks
2006-11-14 14:54:38 · answer #4 · answered by ScubaSteve2007 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah they pay more but TNA wrestlers dont have to work as much
2006-11-13 21:11:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hellz Jeah!
2006-11-13 22:59:18 · answer #6 · answered by J-Kidd "07" 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably because no one has heard of TNA
2006-11-13 20:54:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeah because wwe is multi-million dollar company.
2006-11-13 21:37:06 · answer #8 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-11-13 22:06:46 · answer #9 · answered by myndi h 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it does.
2006-11-13 21:01:28 · answer #10 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋