Which is more likely to be real (on this planet)?

Question

Which is more likely to be real on this planet: UFO's with little aliens inside. OR bigfoot aka sasquatch?

Answer 1

While aliens and Bigfoot are among the many myths, folklore and "believe it or not" there are both photos, ancient markings, historical statements and personal account of both.

Aborigine Paintings dipicted many forms of figures not of human formations. The most obvious clues to an extraterrestrial visit long ago are found in the drawings of ancient cultures. One such drawing is located inside a cave in Kimberly Mountain, a peak on the western side of Australia. Haunting the surface of the cave walls are paintings of several beings with round heads and huge black eyes. Calling the figures in the paintings the Wondjina, the Aborigines consider the beings extremely sacred. The Wondjina, originally drawn in some period between ten thousand to thirty thousand years ago, bear little resemblance to any known earth creature. However, the Wondjina slightly resemble the gray type of aliens reported today by alleged alien abductees. The Wondjina and the Grays look similiar because they both have large, black eyes and a pear-shaped head. Therefore, it is possible that the Wondjina are actually aliens seen by the Aborigines a long time ago.

In the Sahara desert, another strange figure painted on the wall of a cave, the "Great Martian God", is located in the Tassili mountains. It was called the "Great Martian God" because it resembled Martians found in comic books. Discovered by Henri Lhote on an expedition after World War II into the mountains, the Martian, along with similiar nearby drawings depicting space men are drawn in a much larger scale than the nearby drawings of people, animals, and ones of Egyptian influence.

A small but continuously growing body of physical evidence now exists, in addition to documented visual encounters. This evidence includes: photographs and casts of footprints and handprints, with some of the casts determined by dermal ridge experts to be of unknown primate origin; hair samples found in association with encounters that scientists have determined to be of unknown primate origin; and recorded vocalizations that expert bioacoustics analysts have determined to be of unknown primate origin.

Native American cultures are also rich with related anecdotes pertaining to encounters extending back hundreds of years. Indeed, anthropologists have determined that tribes throughout the continent had names for these creatures such as Nalusa Falaya (Choctaw), Tsiatko (Puyallup/Nisqually), Skookum (Chinook), Windigo (Ojibway), Omah (Yurok), Bukwas (Kwakwaka'wakw), and many others.

Regardless of the credence accorded the myths and legends of Native Americans, the Texas Bigfoot Research Center maintains that the body of contemporary sighting reports, ecological patterns and relationships arising from the study of those reports, along with the physical evidence that has accumulated during the last fifty years, and our own personal observations while in the field, all serve to indicate the existence of a living species that has yet to be documented.

So maybe it is a matter of what you want to believe. Much study and wonder has been done to document the proof, or non-exsistance of many things...........

Aliens, Bigfoot, Heaven, Hell, the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Soul mates, the Tooth fairy, Unicorns and Christ have been under fire for years.

Which is most likely to exsist? Belief, wonder, discovery, faith, culture or science?

I would say that all things have the possibility to exsist with the understanding that all things could be fictitious.

Answer 2

If Bigfoot was real, I think somebody would've found bones or something by now. As for aliens, if there's life on other planets (which I think it is, because it would be weird for Earth to be the only planet in the Universe that can sustain life), it might as well be less advanced, I don't know why people assume from the start that aliens must be more advanced.
Anyway, we can't prove of disprove any of them (aliens or Bigfoot) beyond any shadow of doubt.

Answer 3

Can we accept neither?

Aliens is so unlikely as the realities of space travel make our little arm of the galaxy an unlikely backwater, a poor choice for any species to look or visit in an attempt to make contact with another species.

Bigfoot, well, a species of that size would consume a great deal of natural resources. As a top consumer with few if any natural enemies, it would require a large amount of undisturbed land to live. And frankly, there isn't that much undisturbed land left along the Pacific Northwest where he's supposed to dwell.

I think we have to give up on both.

Answer 4

life would have come into existence when conditions occured favourable for it.fvaourable conditions to occur more time and space is required.time and universe is limitless. so the probality becomes certain.so it tells that there are many living beings in different planets in this universe at different stages of develpments.so UFO can visit us.but however as science has developed a lot in our own planet and so we are continuously scanning the sky for messages emanated from beings of other planets.so we will get the message first for it takes lesser time to reach us than the UFO which is in physical form. so on some day UFO's will visit us and by that time we would have got the message it advance also about their visit!

Answer 5

UFO's with little aliens inside

Answer 6

I would have to say UFO's , it's impossible that humans are the only inteligent life form in the universe, big foot is so out dated & fake, it's worse than my grandpa using buck skins for rubbers.

Answer 7

I hope it's little aliens.
Why?
Because they are likely to be far more intelligent than bigfoot !
They could give us chemistry answers, solve world hunger, clean up the environment, and so on. Cool.

Answer 8

Both. Your definition of "real" must be defined.

Your question reveals a limited mind.

Dr Michio Kaku, CCNY, suggests UFOs AND stange
creatures can access this universe from others by space-time passageways called "wormholes" (go Google search).

Now YOU, "get real".

Jon-Erik Beckjord, MBA http://www.beckjord.com/

[e-mail]

Answer 9

IF i have to choose betwen them I would have to say the Sasquach. It is possible that there is some form of yet undiscovered bi-pedal homonid running around the forrests and woods of the northwestern US and Canada.

Answer 10

Big foot is more believable because it would correspond with other simian life. Alien visitors are unlikely because of the time distortion inherent with relativistic speeds.