As soon as the Dems retreat like little girls, the terrorists will take over Iraq and kill thousands....like the North did to the South during the Vietnam war.
Why are liberal Democrats such spineless wussbags?
2006-11-13 11:55:11 · 18 answers · asked by andyandy28227 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jl_jack(azz) - FYI I DID serve in the Army - Active Duty too in the early 90's after Gulf War 1 - so tuck that in your spineless liberal pipe and smoke it.
In addition, if your side wouldn't keep HELPING the enemy by coddling terrorists maybe I could go to Iraq and point a terrorist out to you.
Even if I did point out a terrorist however, you and your liberal ilk would probably try to give him aid and comfort anyway - or maybe have one of his GI sniper video broadcast on CNN for him. :)
Nice try tho....
2006-11-13 12:45:18 · update #1
I don't think we will end up cutting and running, but if they did, yes of course Bush would be blamed, he is blamed for everything.
2006-11-13 11:56:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋
I am not gonna answer this question but i wanna add something here. If they do pull out the military out in Iraq that would be the most wrong move that the government here in the us would do. But no one should not blame President George W. Bush for that for what ever is gonna happened there because first of all He does not quit something that he start and not Finnish the job He will Finnish the job that's for sure. And if they do not Finnish that job, then there will be problem I'm sure of that the terrorist will come back and try to kill more Innocent people not just Iraqi people our Americans people to they come to or land and terrorize us. Now the question is will America let that happened. Now i do believed in our leader (George W. Bush) our President that he will do that right thing that he will do a good job on that. And i know he has a WORD OF HONOR. My family serve in the military also so i know how it feels to lose someone you care and to do something right this is right what our President is doing is just right its called justice for the innocent and for our land. I SUPPORT MY PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH.
2006-11-13 16:02:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dems will give up blaming Bush after the prepare flies off the cliff and the rustic is lifeless. Myself, i imagine we will favor a fee ticket with C.C. Myers on it to fix the wear. we will ought to grant him an advantage or he received't take the deal. Limbaugh is over-qualified. So is Coulter. i don't believe of the TOTUS might want to settle for both of them as a clean roommate on the White residing house, besides. Washington has a low-reduce on IQ's, and the TOTUS prefers entire obedience.
2016-11-29 02:56:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you have been watching TV over the past 3 years, you would have noticed there were thousands of civilians killed in Iraq already. Also, Al-Queda is coming back into power in Afghanistan. Was that the Democrats fault or the fact YOUR PRESIDENT did a "CUT AND RUN"?
If you were to read your history, it shows Nixon left Vietnam (he was Republican, by the way).
Spineless is the fact you have no concern about our Valued Soldiers who are getting killed FOR NO REASON. All three fractions in Iraq are killing Americans. The reason there are terrorist in Iraq is because they want to kill us. When Saddam was in power, there were no terrorist. bush actually allowed terrorist to come in because of his revenge on Saddam. This is bush's fault. Now the Democrats have to come in and fix it.
2006-11-13 12:24:50 · answer #4 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would certainly hope that even the flower children of the democratic party have enough sense to realize the Islamic threat.
If they cut and run, and we inevitably end up fighting the terrorists in our towns and cities - the dems will have seen their last heyday at leadership in either house.
This is one war that we cannot lose - and if the Democrats and their hippie base don't realize this, it'll be a very sad day for democracy.
2006-11-13 12:04:02 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Wasn't it something like 2 million Vietnamese slaughtered after the US left Vietnam?
We cannot allow the US to leave Iraq in terror, and the blame matters not.
2006-11-13 12:05:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You're damn right I'm gonna blame Bush for starting the whole thing in Iraq in the first place. We've become the terrorists you crazy con, I can't believe people don't see and understand that. This is exactly what they want. All we're doing over there is generating even more hate toward our country. We are in way more danger now than we would be had we not invaded Iraq.
2006-11-13 12:06:16 · answer #7 · answered by Netta 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Terrorist are killing hundreds every day now anyway. At last count about 165,000. That's thousands more than Sadam ever did. Iraq is a far more dangerous place with the US there than it ever was before it went in to "liberate" the people.
2006-11-13 11:58:53 · answer #8 · answered by jdnmsedsacrasac1 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Number one. Why are you not in Iraq now? Number two. Over 750,000 civilians have left Iraq. Over 655,000 civilians are dead in Iraq. Iraq is now in civil war. You know nothing of war, if you did know war you would not ask this question in this manner, just to be insulting.
Number three. This is the big one for you. You may need to ask Mom or Dad to explain this one. Congress gave the authority to invade Iraq, They did not give the authority to occupy Iraq. Ask Mom or Dad to explain the difference to you.
BTW, can you now go to Iraq and point at a terrorist for me, the Democrats fighting there will shoot him for you. Just point at one.
2006-11-13 12:05:02 · answer #9 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
They will definitely blame President Bush. They have
been brain washed by all of the anti-war crowd!!!!
2006-11-13 12:00:27 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Remember, Bush has the power to veto anything. So if the troops are allowed to come home ( I still can't understand what you rednecks find wrong with that), it will be partially his choice.
Besides, I don't like the idea of a third world dictator telling our troops when to stand down (Iraq's new "Saddam" did just that last week). I also don't like the idea of my grandson being the target of some fool with a stolen U.S. rifle who doesn't appreciate what we're trying to do for his country.
I agree with Thomas Jefferson (loose quotation, here)... "Freedom cannot be given to anyone, it has to be earned".
Let them fight there own battles, we've been there long enough.
2006-11-13 12:02:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋