Why is it that Asian History is better than European History?

Question

Particularly, Chinese, Monguls, Japanese, and countries that later becomes modern day Korea..

I think its because they was so much backstabbing taking place along with the fact that they were always constantly at war.

Answer 1

best chinese mongals and the british i would say and the persians they biggest empires the world knew. some might say with out the romans many of would not be here to. so i guess u can add them. 1 in 6 people in the world is related to gengis khan to. some statistic i guess thats why were all power mad.

Answer 2

hmm problematical determination, i imagine both histories are decision interesting. besides the undeniable fact that purely because of the truth you've an more advantageous danger of doing tremendous in eu heritage i say eu. and that i imagine purely coz you may want to be rushing round isn't an excuse to assert u dnt wanna do it, i imagine its more effective if u submit with the rushing round and get an rather solid mark. then do asian and characteristic a ordinary type cases and by no potential have the great aspect about doing it formerly.

Answer 3

Not better, just different.

Actually, read about the vikings, the goths, the huns and you'll see that Europe was never a pleasant place.

Answer 4

What exactly do you mean by "better"?

I seem to remember some pretty nasty things that all of those nationalities you mention were responsible for.

I think all nations have episodes in their histories that they would rather forget.

Answer 5

Yes, I think the soil over there has less blood as fertilizer.

Answer 6

Possibly..maybe they were one of the earlier civilizations

Answer 7

I think it depends on who you ask

Answer 8

depends on who you are interested, and what years you are studying