I am not sure but society and the American people seem to love their first ladies. Is it possible for someone to get elected that is single?
2006-11-13 10:03:32 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No personally I won't vote for Giuliani as the candidate as I see him as liberal on social issues and a huge spender. We need someone that is fiscally conservative to bring spending under control and keep the government out of every issue.
As for him being single,America does seem to love their first ladies but I believe a daughter, niece or sister could fill that role as long as she had poise and dignity.
2006-11-13 10:17:25 · answer #1 · answered by Akkita 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would like to see the rumor addressed that he was married and dating at the same time before I think about Giulani. As for single status, why would that be a problem for a candidate? You are asking if marriage will be used as a marketing/ campaign tactic? Probably. But that would be discriminatory against 'single' people. Being married does not make a person a better President.
2006-11-13 10:18:07 · answer #2 · answered by commonsense 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure is. Take a look a few years ago in California. They had a Governor who was not married. It use to be a Catholic could not be president because of the pope. Kennedy disproved that. At one time a divorced man could not be president but Reagan disproved that to. So yes a man without a wife could get elected president. It would not be easy but possible.
2006-11-13 10:13:30 · answer #3 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no individual were given "elected". Primaries are literally not some thing better than a mind-set of elimination. What occurs to those votes is ---- not some thing. through the popular/caucus device, the applicants will finally be narrowed right down to a million Democrat and a million Republican. that is what it is all about. think ofyou've got yet another probability to vote contained in the overall Election....they really one which counts -- in November.
2016-11-23 20:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Giuliani. I think his chance is over, though. He would've run on a Bush-esque war on terror platform. And it is apparent that the US has lost its resolve in that regard. And as for loving first ladies, Hillary Clinton was and is evil incarnate.
2006-11-13 10:17:37 · answer #5 · answered by Chris J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's just what we need, male or female. Then we can have all kinds of reality shows based on public opinion about who the President was dating, and give them public approval ratings! The media could rake in a massive ammount of cash, and the people would be entertained... Wow! We just became Europe!
2006-11-13 10:14:40 · answer #6 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't use marital status to decide who to vote for. If I felt he is the best person for the job, I will vote for him.
James Buchanan was a bachelor his whole life. The First Lady while he was in office was his neice, Harriet Lane.
2006-11-13 21:52:43 · answer #7 · answered by Mutt 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Certainly. Why not? Though with Giuliani's history, chances are he'll have a mistress or two around anyway.
2006-11-13 10:06:12 · answer #8 · answered by BrightEyedBlasphemer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not like he's never been married. He is divorced after a very public adulterous affair. Which, by the way, is personal and has no bearing on his fitness for the presidency.
2006-11-13 11:44:19 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I would. I would rather have an effective, productive single President in office, than a mediocre married President. I hope he runs.
2006-11-13 10:11:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋