I live in one of the cities it was partially filmed and watched some of the shooting. It really did dampen the mood and some parts weren't as scary as they might have been if I hadn't seen them film it.
All in all though I thought it was fantastic. I do agree it was graphic. Maybe it was certificated at 15 because it was based on a video game that most kids that age have played.
2006-11-13 07:29:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ersabette 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
The movie sucked and was and is a waste of time. Can't believe you gave it a number at all.
I did see The Prestige... it was ok. Give it a 5 on a scale from one to 10, with 10 being the highest.
Also saw,
The Departed, now that movie was the bomb, give it a 8.
2006-11-13 07:19:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by i_squeeze 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
i love the film silent hill... i am a big fan of the games. yes i do think it should be an 18...
not many people liked this film i think you have to play the games first to get the film
2006-11-13 18:28:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by hugebaby 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes it was a bit head strong, i think the censors took the piss with the age because it is a video game,rules for 1 and rules for another. like you said xalent film but should of been called something else, like the mega bad trip into the real dimension.
2006-11-13 07:24:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by clare p 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok, first...they don't seem to be lifeless. permit me see if i will clarify this the way I figured it out (I had to learn like loopy and watch the action picture lower back to get it). There are 2 dimensions linked with city. One length is in modern time, one is thirty years in the past. in the time of the direction of the action picture the little lady and her mom finally end up in the 2nd, older length spoke of as the Shadow lands. i'm uncertain why however the mummy and daughter weren't in a position to step out of the Shadow land length. They went residing house nevertheless trapped in the Shadow land length collectively as every physique else is in the present length. are you able to declare sequel?
2016-10-17 05:47:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
id agree on both should have been an 18 and it is a very good film but just lately i see many films that i think they put wrong ages on but that's my opinion
2006-11-13 07:22:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ironstu3 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wish I enjoyed the movie like you did. I thought Silent Hill sucked. I didn't like any part of it.
2006-11-13 07:35:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by svg7373 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
it didnt scare me...although it probably would have if i was still 15 years old lol....i agree it should have been an 18...i did wince a few times tho when watching it...my sister inlaw had to turn it off lol....
2006-11-13 07:19:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Silent Hill did suck, it was a crappy movie.
2006-11-13 07:24:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I SAW THAT MOVIE AND IT WAS OK BUT I GOT CONFUSED AND I COULDN'T REALLY PAY ATTENTION CAUSE THEIR WERE SO MANY TEENS YELLING
2006-11-13 07:25:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lore 3
·
1⤊
1⤋