Today there is a municpal election where I live, and for councillor there are 4 people running.
I am not happy with the current councillor and would very much like to see him replaced, as basically he does nothing and has no time for his constituants.
However the other 3 candidates have no websites, have made no effort to contact the people in their riding (pamphlets, phone calls, etc). There have been a few mentions of them in the media, but not enough for me to really know what they stand for.
What would you do? Pick a random name? Pick the one you know most about? Or would you abstain from voting for anyone on the basis that you can not make a reasonable informed decision? Keeping in mind that those kinds of votes are not tabulated even if you decline the ballot (which I wouldn't do as I am interested in voting for Mayor, though I have declined ballots in the past for what it was worth when it was the best of bad options)
What would you do? How would you decide?
2006-11-13
06:15:49
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Ok, I did look into the information. I have looked at every bit of information the candidates have chosen to put out there (Even a silly survey put out by a local biking group that one candidate responded to). They have just chosen not to put much out there.
Do you think that a candidate who you have to call (assuming that I could even FIND a number, assuming they even HAVE a campain office) is the kind of person you want representing you? Seriously it is 2006 it takes less than an hour and $0 to make a crappy webpage or even a mySpace account.
2006-11-13
06:28:09 ·
update #1