west brom is a dump very dirty and not a nice place
2006-11-16 21:31:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Coventry and Wolverhampton are cities, so technically they can not be named the dirtiest town. This brings us to West Bromwich, which is clearly not ugly as it has beautiful purple health care buildings.
2006-11-16 10:11:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Longshanks 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wolverhampton or Coventry. West Bromwich has been improved dramatically over the years. Yes there are a few dodgy areas but it's like that whichever town you go to.
2006-11-14 04:39:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by emmalp75 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Definately West Bromwich, and there isnt anything there that could please the eye, Wolverhampton is making the effort to clean up its image, Contrary to myth-there are parts of Coventry that are pleasant, the old medieval area that hitlers luftwaffe have missed in the town center!
2006-11-13 21:37:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by pitmonster03 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
not so solid factors Aston Handsworth Newtown Winson eco-friendly Lozells Smethwick Nechells Highgate Sparkhill Sparkbrook Balsall Heath Alum Rock Washwood Heath Ward end Small Heath Bordesley eco-friendly Erdington Tyseley Accocks eco-friendly Yardley Perry Barr super Barr
2016-10-22 00:33:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Black Country Towns are not so Great!
But Coventry is possibly right there with them as well!!
2006-11-13 17:40:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by J. Charles 6
·
0⤊
0⤋