First, Bush 'played' a college kid;
then he 'played' in the reserves, just enough so that his daddy could give him the chance to fly a jetfighter without actually participating in the rigid regimen most reservists have to endure;
then he 'played' businessman and oil tycoon, losing investors' money by the millions;
then he 'played' governor of Texas;
now he's 'playing' President and Commander-In-Chief without even realizing that his own family - and their wealthy friends - have set him up as a 'patsy' that only does as he's told to do, when he's told to do, and how he's coached to act. -RKO-
2006-11-13 04:21:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
what's a "Bush Conservative"? that is an oxymoron. there replaced into not some thing in any respect conservative about the Bush administration. And in case you hate Bush a lot, and love Obama a lot, possibly the questions you may be asking are... Why is Obama continuing to finish (or maybe boost up) each and each and every of the Bush administration (CFR) regulations? Why will there nonetheless be 50,000 troops in Iraq in 2012? Why are those who concept they may be coming living house going to be shipped off to Afghanistan extremely? Why did Gates proceed to be? Why are CIA "renditions" (abductions) and torture nonetheless A-ok? Why is Obama protecting the Bush administration from study and indictment? Why does the Council on overseas relatives carry a lot effect interior both political activities? Why are the Clinton and Bush households so deeply intertwined? I.E. invoice Clinton trafficked drugs for Daddy Bush even as he replaced into CIA director. look it up. Why are such lots of figures from the Clinton administration resurfacing in Obama's cupboard? Why replaced into Tim Geithner appointed as Sec of Treasury? If Obama is so dissatisfied through the misuse of the TARP money (from the "bailout invoice" that he fought for, and voted for, back in October) that Geithner commonly oversaw the distribution of (as president of the ny Federal Reserve), then why employ and propose Geithner? WHY DOES THE FEDERAL RESERVE REFUSE to inform CONGRESS the position 2.2 TRILLION funds WENT? can't you note what's taking place? the really project that "replaced" replaced into the RHETORIC. The DUDE is nice. BUSH AND OBAMA ARE managed through a similar pastimes. Globalists, and imperative Bankers, secretly (or, not so secretly) run our entire authorities. both activities!!! awaken!!!!
2016-11-23 19:37:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is not "playing" President. In case you missed the news from Nov 00 & 04, Bush IS the President. The world would be far worse off had Gore or Kerry won.
2006-11-13 04:31:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
He's so concerned about what's happening in other countries. Why do we keep sending troops overseas, and enough with this stupid aid we are sending to Iraq. There was an article in the paper about a woman here in orange county California that was homeless. She called some shelters asking for help but they turned her down saying they weren't able to take someone who's in a wheelchair. Finally the church came to her aid and found her a place to stay. It really breaks my heart to see this sort of thing happen here and yet Bush is spending billions of dollars on Iraq.
2006-11-13 04:57:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The world would be better off if bored twinkies would put thought into how to support the country rather than play into the hands of our enemies by being part of their propaganda system and attacking the morale of Americans.
2006-11-13 04:35:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually, the universe would be better off if he just resigned, took Cheney with him, went back to Crawford, and raised chickens for the rest of his miserable life.
2006-11-13 04:22:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No;
The World would be better off if George had stayed out of politics all together!
2006-11-13 04:15:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Old Guy 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
And do what? Abdicate the presidency for the next two years to Dick Cheney?
You know, I don't think there's enough rhetoric in the world today. Thanks for doing your part.
2006-11-13 04:22:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by happy heathen 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, then the most powerful man on earth will no longer be a leader...he needs to be president, and a strong one at that
People are FAR too hard on the man
2006-11-13 04:16:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
What kind of moral compass must you have when you devote all your energy to smearing the President but couldn't care less about what al Qaeda is doing day after day?
2006-11-13 04:17:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
0⤊
3⤋