don't you think it makes more sense if all the band members had similar (or somewhat closely related) musical taste?
I mean, when it comes to genres of Rock & Metal, they're a lot & can be rather different..
don't you think it'll make it easier for them all to agree on which songs to play & how they write originals & all?
could be just my opinion, what do you think?
thanks
2006-11-13 03:35:57 · 8 answers · asked by Whatever 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
The biggest thing is that you all do need to agree on what genre that the band will be. That is probably the most important thing to keep in mind even before asking the people to be a part of the group.
I have seen first-hand too many times when a musician doesn't like the music they are playing and it hurts the performance. Skilled musicians can play various genres, but they typically will have a real passion for certain ones. For a band to really be good (beyond just having good musicians) you need to have people that really "get" the music. Without that, you only have someone playing notes and not making music.
2006-11-13 03:50:03 · answer #1 · answered by mrebholz72 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, if they share similar musical interest the band will be a lot more tight personally and professionally. If your trying to put a band together and 1 member likes Iron Maiden and 1 member likes New Kids On the Block you might have a few problems from the get go!
2006-11-13 03:39:39 · answer #2 · answered by arenaimage 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My band came from all types of different genres! before the band the only thing I played was punk, then i learned a lot of rock, ska, and even Bluegrass. Our tastes all intertwined into a style of our own. I think as long as you are willing to compromise, different music taste is good. We actually openned for the violent femmes twice and were on 10 sites of the warped tour.
2006-11-13 03:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jon C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree, if one likes Slayer and another likes My Chemical Romance, you're going to have some serious disagreements about what the music should sound like. I can't see that it could last long, unless one of them is just willing to go along with the other persons ideas and lets face it, even if they do they are still going to get really frustrated and probably leave. There's the matter of respecting the other persons music as well. I wouldn't do it.
2006-11-13 03:40:23 · answer #4 · answered by Velouria 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't consider you on the bands you have stated. easily, alot of people do hear to them in basic terms because of the fact of there classic nature, yet thats not the favourite public of listeners (by ability of my estimation, it is). have you ever heard Judas Priest on Screaming for Vengeance? Its some distance, some distance better than painkiller, and sounds not something lIke ac/dc or weapons and Roses. Judas Priest is between the main unusual and influential bands of all time. weapons and Roses and Ac/Dc are only influential... no originality in any respect, exceedingly in G'n'R who at there appropriate moments only ripped off Aerosmith. The 3 hundred and sixty 5 days they formed is amazingly significant to there kind. It enables you tell how unique a band is, which in turn judges there benefit as a extreme musical act. I do see what you advise nevertheless. Alot of people declare to love a band in basic terms because of the fact there previous and significant yet incredibly do not care concerning the song. MQ: Statistically, greater solid bands could have been previous when you consider that theres alot greater previous than present day, if it is clever. I additionally like the sound on previous recordings better, somewhat in the 60's and 70's. additionally, the 50's and 60's are the only time whilst i think of common rock song grew to become into solid. each and every thing eighty's onward grew to become into in general tremendously undesirable, a minimum of whilst in comparison with the underground. 40's - Screaming Jay Hawkins 50's - hyperlink Wray or Johnny funds 60's - The Jimi Hendrix adventure 70's - Black Sabbath eighty's - the Cramps ninety's - death 00's - Zombie Ghost practice Edit: Whoops, I positioned Jay Hawkins int he 40's, yet hes in the 50's. somebody above me positioned him in the incorrect decade besides.
2016-10-22 00:27:59 · answer #5 · answered by corl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mixed tastes can make for a very original sound. Embrace it rather than fight over it - it could well make you stand out from what is already an over-saturated genre.
I look forward to hearing some :)
2006-11-13 03:39:16 · answer #6 · answered by Sir Digby Chicken Bhuna 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah of coarse that makes alto of sense well be loving rock&metal lol
2006-11-13 03:37:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sod that.
What matters most is that they can all play their instruments.
2006-11-13 03:37:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋