2006-11-13 03:27:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
LOL...This is so random...
But I would bet that Tiger would make a better Speaker of the house....
2006-11-13 03:36:33 · answer #1 · answered by SALMON 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Tiger Woods
2006-11-13 03:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by brock 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does this have to do with politics?
Nancy Pelosi is a professional politician, and soon-to-be speaker of the house of representatives. Tiger Woods is a professional golfer and one of the best ever at it. Which one do you think is a better golfer? Duh...
By the same logic that shows why you wouldn't bet on Nancy Pelosi to win the US Open, I wouldn't want Tiger Woods to be speaker of the house -- he doesn't know the first thing about the job. Nancy does :)
2006-11-13 03:31:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Tiger Woods! Pelosi cheats!
2006-11-13 03:29:15 · answer #4 · answered by alwaysdreaming 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pelosi is a bad joke on the country. I don't believe a word she says and question the IQ of anyone who thinks she is a worthwhile human being.
With a competent and fair main stream media Pelosi would be in jail for crimes against humanity.
Tiger, on the other hand, is a superior human being.
The two of them should not be connected in any way.
2006-11-13 03:35:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
even as i imagine Phil is extra relaxing to visual demonstrate unit and is the better scrambler even as needed, it is problematic to argue that he's better even as he's gained such lots of a lot less tournaments and Majors than Tiger has. Phil is truthfully between the perfect contained in the recreation yet i don't think of both are similar. Tiger's gained much better than Phil and has the skill to win many extra. Phil has an magnificent concepts-set and coronary heart, yet he looks to not be able to address the rigidity on a similar factor that Tiger can, that is area of the reason he's only not as reliable. Tiger also shows much better course administration and far extra caution even as needed than Phil, who looks to take way too many hazards, which i imagine has a large area to do inclusive of his constrained achievement in evaluation to Tiger.
2016-11-23 19:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tiger Woods...and better looking and more charming as well.
2006-11-13 03:31:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tiger's probably a better politician too.
2006-11-13 03:40:22 · answer #8 · answered by clsga 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There isn't a golf tournament that Pelosi has not won.
2006-11-13 03:34:11 · answer #9 · answered by C = JD 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know what the obvious answer is but I don't get the point of the question.
2006-11-13 03:58:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋