What is/are Charge for Fraud in FACTUM in the American & Canadian Courts, inter alia, Perjury, Obstruction..?

Question

Since 1990 I am representing myself before all federal & provincial courts in Canada, Ontario & Quebec

I filed ample motions and lawsuits against lawyers for Misrepresentation of Facts & Law in Factum

It is practice in Canadian Courts to remove productive facts from Factum & I have never seen a judge objects to these kind of frauds

I know in Iran & USA there are many lawyers behind the bars for crimes v. administration of justice
It is impossible a judge admits to lawyers' corruption in Canada

I am requesting these questions be answered with care for the 'Public Interest' & 'Judiciary Interest' & I appreciate if you just write the Title of your profession: Judge, Lawrer etc.

1 What is the History of Factum?
2 Factum amount to what kind of document: affidavit, submission?

3 What is the legal interpretation of Lawyers' Signature in Factum? Affirmation, sworn

4 What is the proper charge perjury, obstruction of justice, fraud?
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/judgtable.html

Answer 1

A proper answer to your legal questions will only come from a criminal lawyer. I can tell you generally that a factum is simply a pleading in an appeal case. It is the document where you lay out your claim/response.

If, however, you have complaints against the work of individual lawyers, you should contact the Law Society in the province where they practice.

In Ontario, it is the Law Society of Upper Canada: http://www.lsuc.on.ca/

In Quebec, it is Le Barreau du Québec: http://www.barreau.qc.ca/