The Cult That Rules the World....?

Question

Everytime I write something about it, Yahoo answers deletes my questions and suspends my account... SOoOoOoOOo much for freedom of speech, whats wrong in telling people what I think???

The Cult that Rules The World = Descedants of Crusaders...

it is no surprise that once a human experiences total power and control... he/she will do anything to keep it intact... be it even killing ur soldiers for a non-existent theological theory...

For a detailed knowledge of how I reached this conclusion, visit my blog at http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-xqu7jZ08dK.m73Nr1f.ksQ--?cq=1

I think this question will be deleted too... but the Truth has to come out sooner or later, idiotic yahoo answers can't hide it for too long

why is it so hard for people to understand the bad face of their american, british, european, russian governments and yet do nothing about it? I mean, whats there for living, if they wanna rob you out of your peace constantly to feed their power and control?

lipstick, stop applying only lipstick and not logic to your arguments. it looks to you public that u did it, in fact they control the polls and even such "hugely life threatening changes" in the house

iraq: the facts I posted in my blog are historical facts and not just a fairy tale as u would love to see it... are u just not wanting to call that proof to give ur argument credibility, then too bad. there is enough evidence to back my theory. I assumed you learned some history, but looks like u didnt learn anything related to it. So ur argument has no grounds.

iraq: ur very good in twisting my words to show people I lie... which seems to be deeply embedded in u.... I never stated u didnt contact, then what story u are making up? My comment about contact was made to Iknownothing guy on my other question... are u that cheap in doing anything to put blames on me, well, I dont blame u, I brought up historical facts and showed u the true ancestory of americans... and I understand why u keep on attacking me for showing u ur ancestory... after all, crusaders loved fighting and attacking... u exhibit that for sure

iraq: how about this statement of urs depicting a twist: "after you called me a liar for the 8th time and failed to understand the context in which you did call Americans foolish retards"

I explained that above. no need for repitition.

half of ur comment was made about proof... well, let me see:

Arabian Muslim Expansion in 7th century : do I need to prove this?

Crusades: now come on (do I need to prove this)

British invasions, Soviet Union, etc.: Do I need to prove this?

Columbus: Do I need to prove this?

Persian/Russian origins of Crusaders: Do I need to prove this?

Lines of Jews awaiting in Auschwitz: You may need to rent a holocaust video documentary which shows u video clips of the Jews awaiting segregation in Auschwitz, look at their faces, and compare that to a persian guy.

and if ur still looking for proofs, well, then go to wiki, and read about it there... verification of historical events are there "partially"... better, get a history book.. I assumed u knew, well..

Answer 1

do you hate yourself that much?

Answer 2

I've done some genealogical research, and if I remember correctly, I think that some of my ancestors fought in the Crusades (as did so many other people's). And no, I don't want to take over the world. I have enough trouble keeping my apartment clean, so I don't want to have to clean up the entire planet, too.

Answer 3

I see you have post this Q a second time. You know, I just glanced through some of the respndants answers and I don't recal insulting you in my answer..only providing my point of view, information based on having lived in the middle east and asking you for supporting sourcestoyour information. Yet you go on instant attack mode claim that I am making up lies (which you have given no proof of or any counter argument) and keep telling me that you on this posting and your Crusader Descedants posting (when I have contacted you so once again you have called me a LIAR without any proof...seems to be a hablt of yours).

If you want me to call you names, OK...and yes, after you called me a liar for the 8th time and failed to understand the context in which you did call Americans foolish retards...which I answered and explained on your other Q I did stoop to your level and call you a few names. I regret that ater 4 years of college and 4 years earning 2 graduate degrees I resorted to name calling.

So there we are. So now, on your other Crusaders Q you last told me "I get proofs and show it to all, unlike u that is...". So where are the proofs? I look forward to your proofs. And why not try to resist calling meand everyone you don't agree with liars. Also you ask me for proofs, stats and links. Read my response again. I made no claims. I asked you for your proof (nice, easy to say they are in the library) and I asked you to explain why the world Cult Leaders are not leading leading all the governments of the world as you imply they must be doing. So...your proofs please...and don't just tell me they are in the library. You provide stats, links (not you blog, that isn't proof) and any other valid proof.

OK, at least you didn't call me a LIAR this time. Well perhaps you did as you said I twisted your words. What words specifically off yours did I twist? I certain hope you are not going to say that I twisted your words about your statement that you will get and show your proofs to al because as you know it you wrote it in one of your comments. So which of your words; exactly, did I twist?

I dislike having to repeat myself but earlier you said (your words, not mine).." I get proofs and will show it to all". I and no doubt others are still waiting for you to get & show your proofs as you promised, stated, wrote you would do. I used 3 different words since I wouldn't be accused of twisting your words. When can we expect you to show them to us?

I would also like you to explain, correct or clarify your statement regarding your "hidtorical facts" you placed on your blog. Again I politely requested some souce, link or other means of discovering where you found your historical proof. Also, I never have said they were fales or they where farily tales as you claim I wouldliketosethem be shown as. Still you have not provided me or anyone else this supporting source. Now, your words again "the facts I posted in my blog are historical facts...are you not not wanting me to call that proof..." My reponse to your statement & question is...no, I don't want you to to say what you wrote is proof. Whay I am asking (again) is that you provide is a reference to documentation, supporting documentations, a "link" as you would expect that I can read and seewhere you found your "facts".

Then, your words again in the same posting..."there is enough evidence to back my theory". Certainly you have learned & understand the differency between evidence and a theory? At the basic level a theory requires proof. Lets define the the 2 key words you have used to support your historial facts you wrote in you blog. Obviously those 2 words are "evidence" and "theory".
The Encarta Dictionary (used world wide and not just in the USA) defines evidence as: Sign of Proof; something that gives a sign or proof of the existence of truth or something, or that helps that somebody to come to a particular conclusion.

Also, the the word evidence in the Thesaurus: Proof (noun) - confirmation, verification, facts and substantiation.

So, all I am asking for is a sign of proof (a referenence,source) that confirms your historical facts. The request is not confusing, twists your words is insulting.

Using Encarta Dictionary, theory is defined as: speculation -contemplation; an idea formed by
speculation.

The word theory in the Thesaurus: premise, conjecture & supposition.

Bottom line you called your historical facts (and I have never said I disagree with your blod content, I just asked that if westerners were a cult that ran the world way were there non-western governments and you never cited evidence of what you now call a theory. All I was interested in was knowing your souce so I could resd it a decide for myself. So now you tell me that you have evidence to support the theory of the facts written in you blog. Fine. Cite your evidenceusing a source other that your own blog and we should ne fine. As in a court of law, all you need to do is provide evidence that proves you position or point.

All I have been asking is that you cite or provide the proofs you have said 2 or 3 times that you would. And why are you so positive that once I read the sources/site you provide that I'll ignore, disbelieve or won't read them?

Well, I'll look forward to the proof you have offered to provide every one and reading what it has to say. Then based on the evidence and information I'll decide whether I believe in the world wide Cult. If I don't you should realize or understand that it doesn't mean I don't believe
the historical facts in your blog are inaccurat. I simply means I don't agree with you conclutions.

Rational people can disagree after all. And if you fail to post your proofs....well that's the difference between having evidence and having a theory. In addition to studying business in graduate school I also studied law.

Answer 4

Here's a little something for you. Why don't you research the involvement Benjamin Franklin had with The Hellfire Club. You would be surprised.

Answer 5

The Illuminati. Interesting, if you ask me. Same so as the Skull and Bones.

Answer 6

Are you Napoleon? Do you walk around with your hand in your jacket? Or are you Ben Franklin?Just curious.

Answer 7

What do you mean we do nothing about it....We changed ownership in the house...that's a great start...

Answer 8

There is no Illuminati.

Answer 9

Your totally insane and irrational. Please take your medication.