English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Looking at getting a house built, over $1000 for an external vented range hood. How good is external to internal?
Is this worth the money?

2006-11-13 02:08:51 · 3 answers · asked by Calum H 2 in Home & Garden Maintenance & Repairs

3 answers

I suggest you do it "after market" assuming the house isn't case hardened stainless steel. $1000 is very largely PROFIT,,,for someone.

Internally vented range hoods do not dispell fumes, smoke, etc. but might filter something. Extrenally exiting "VENTS/Chimneys, even to a vent out of the house roof, are better suited.

Rev. Steven

2006-11-13 02:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0 0

It is preferable to vent your range externally so you can remove smoke, grease and excess carbon monoxide outside your home. Typically range hoods vented through the roof for one story homes, or side vented for two story homes. If it is not possible to vent the range hood externally, you can install an internally vented hood that will trap grease and some smoke, but the they are not able to remove odors or harmful gases.

I think the cost, which covers the changes needed to your roof, would be worth it. It may be a large cost initially but I think you'll be happier with it in the long run.

2006-11-13 02:18:36 · answer #2 · answered by designerranger 2 · 0 0

You need to check the building code in your area. Most require outside venting. Inside venting could be a fire hazard. If a pan of grease catches fire on your stove, the inside vent sends the flames into your attic.

2006-11-13 02:18:39 · answer #3 · answered by gntolng 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers