I am British and work in England. The company i work for was taken over by a larger company a few months ago. Bit by bit the new management have been making changes to the terms and conditions under which we work ,ie different working hours, reductions in staff discounts, new pay schedule etc. All of these things were outlined very specifically in the contracts our previous managers gave us, but the new management have made the changes anyway and said that they see it as "minor changes to our terms and conditions". They have now issued us new contracts of employment which are less favourable than our old contracts, with several 'grey' areas, and it seems we are expected to sign them or 'seriously consider if we want to work for that company'.
How long are the new owners LEGALLY obliged to honour the former contracts of employment as issued by the previous owner/managers?
2006-11-13
00:54:33
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Sight
4
in
Business & Finance
➔ Other - Business & Finance
Previously the business was a Limited company and was family owned and run, employing 50 to 60 full-time and part-time staff. We do not have a union.
The new owners are a national company with many locations and a couple of thousand employees. The changes being made are supposedly 'to bring us in-line with the rest of the company'.
I understand we may have been spoiled in the past by a generous employer who believed in paying good staff good money and providing 'perks' to keep the good staff happy.
Happy staff = good customer service = happy customers = happy business!
Sadly, this ethos flies in the face of the corporate attitude the new owners employ. They seem to be much more the kind of employers that pay peanuts to employ monkeys and do not require staff to use their brains and would much more prefer us to be quiet and do as we're told!
There are bound to be changes when a new company takes over, but surely there is a difference between change, and being trodden all over!
2006-11-13
01:52:16 ·
update #1