2006-11-12 22:31:15 · 9 answers · asked by EDWIN W 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No but they should be. The only problem with that is who will give the tests? Other people in political office, or doctors in the politicians pockets? I think it would be hard to get someone to do it honestly in the first place.
2006-11-12 22:35:37 · answer #1 · answered by smoothsophie 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You must know the answer because we all know drug use has been reported among politicians yet we have heard of no one being suspended or banned for it.
You dont think those characters could get through Parliament without a bit of "help" do you, and whoever thought up the health and safety laws just had to have found some particularly good gear, perhaps it was only 98% vim or Bat aid, as they were away with the fairies that day.
2006-11-12 22:49:30 · answer #2 · answered by "Call me Dave" 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but when in Parliament they all have access to a duty GP who is frequently persuaded to prescribe class A drugs such as cocaine to "help with problems staying alert".
2006-11-12 22:51:50 · answer #3 · answered by ♥Robin♥ (Scot,UK) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope......to many would test positive for skunk & coke
But very, very good question
2006-11-12 22:39:01 · answer #4 · answered by speedball182 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that would be like the government investigating the government.
in those cases the government is always INNOCENT.
2006-11-12 23:18:03 · answer #5 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they are not. But, that is a whale of an idea, since all the Democrats are on crack.
2006-11-12 22:36:30 · answer #6 · answered by Kammi S 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No they are not...not even an IQ test
2006-11-12 22:40:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope
2006-11-12 22:32:21 · answer #8 · answered by anonymous 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...... but they should be! (much more often too!)
2006-11-12 22:34:46 · answer #9 · answered by le_coupe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋