English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are the pros and cons of a bifurcated system of barristers and solicitors v.s. an integrated system of lawyers (i.e. without such distinction) in a common law jurisdiction?

Thanks!!

2006-11-12 20:57:58 · 1 answers · asked by Liverfan 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

1 answers

Generally understanding of transactional law is a very broad area, just as broad as the intricacies of litigation, trial procedure and evidence.

In integrated systems, lawyers usually end up specializing in one area or the other anyway. The difference is that they can try any of them, without needing separate licenses or degrees. This allow for more options with legal representation, especially in civil matters.

The split system means more specialized training, but could make it more difficult for the transactional solicitor to handle a specific court case, or for the barrister to handle simple legal paperwork.

2006-11-14 04:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers