Well I could venture a few possible answers for that.
One is that, as many previous answers have pointed out, it just takes way too long for evolution to take place that no clear change can be seen in a short period. Certainly not within the range of recorded history.
Secondly, evolution happens because of natural selection, or sometimes artificial selection. What this means is that a certain characteristic of a creature might give it a survival advantage or reproductive advantage over others within the species, and has a better chance of surviving and reproducing. Future generations will then increasingly have this trait as those without the trait will slowly die out, and those with the trait will flourish.
This, in recent times, does not happen with humans. In our increasingly tolerating society, people who are disadvantaged in some way have no less survival possibilities than those who are beyond perfect. While the brilliant few might reach great heights in their lives, this is not really reflected in reproduction as those who have inferior traits often do survive to reproduce. Even those who are severely disabled and are unable to make a living are saved by the society. While from a social stand point this is brilliant and humane, from a evolutionary perspective this would mean the human species will barely change.
Attempts to apply artificial selection on humans are known as eugenics, and this set of practices is heavily condemned in many parts of the world due to its inhumane qualities. The attempts of Hitler to "cleanse" the human race by allowing only healthy 'pure breed' humans to reproduce and killing the others also falls into this category.
I hope this answers your question.
2006-11-12 22:04:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kannan C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically, men were never apes. I am sure you have seen a dog, a fox, and a coyote. You have no problem seeing them as related. You understand that there is something similar about them anatomically and even at the level of behavior. The same is true of primates, apes, chimps and us. Just as a hyena did not come from a fox; we did not come from an ape. We are cousins, meaning that we have some ancestor in our very extended family tree in common.
In addition, there are changes and mutation all the time in the human species. We are changing. Most mutations are deadly, but there are some that are beneficial like those that confer resistance to disease. It would take thousands of years to see a new species from the accumulation of all of these minor differences (polymorphisms).
2006-11-13 00:48:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by khamere 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Humans were never apes, we shared a common ancestor.
Congrats, this is the first time I've posted this answer in a whole 4 days.
2006-11-13 03:16:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by John V 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"All these years"...
Men were apes like 3000000 years ago... we have only been 'men' for 10000 years...
Mutation occurs over millions of years, not centuries.
Oh, and look at the last 200 years... Mankind has gotten taller...
The average height has risen by about 8 inches in the past 200 years... how is that for 'fast' mutation?
2006-11-12 19:33:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ozymandias 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well...You need to wait for some more centuries for getting transformed to some other creature.
Don't you think that you don't remain the same old man who was of-late evolved from ape? Yes. you have changed a lot from that primitive man to a well behaved, cultured, and improved being.
2006-11-12 19:40:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by sona_d 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a list of things man has been.
Note the time it takes to slowly evolve from one level to another.
Bear in mind that A.ramidus didn't just wake up one morning as A afarensis. The change was gradual, following climatic changes and so-on. Man has not changed appreciably in 400,000 years.
How much change would there be in recordable history?
Australopithecus ramidus - 5 to 4 million years BCE
Australopithecus afarensis - 4 to 2.7 million years BCE
Australopithecus africanus - 3.0 to 2.0 million years BCE
Australopithecus robustus - 2.2 to 1.0 million years BCE
Homo habilis - 2.2 to 1.6 million years BCE
Homo erectus - 2 to 0.4 million years BCE
Homo sapiens - 400,000 to 200,000 years BCE
Homo sapiens neandertalensis - 200,000 to 30,000 years BCE
Homo sapiens sapiens - 130,000 years BCE to present
Hope this helps.
2006-11-12 21:05:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Labsci 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Darwin's theory of Evolution is a sluggish sluggish procedure. Darwin wrote, "organic decision acts really through taking income of moderate successive differences; she will not in any respect take an magnificent and surprising leap, yet could develop through short and constructive, in spite of the actuality that sluggish steps." And, Darwin conceded that, "If it will be verified that any complicated organ existed, which could not likely were shaped through multiple, successive, moderate changes, my theory would surely damage down." this style of complicated organ will be accepted as an "irreducibly complicated device". An irreducibly complicated device is one composed of numerous aspects, all of that are needed for the device to operate. If even one area is lacking, the entire device will fail to operate. each and every individual area is quintessential. for this reason, this style of device could not have advanced slowly, piece through piece. the without delay ahead mousetrap is a on a daily basis non-organic and organic party of irreducible complexity. that's composed of 5 uncomplicated aspects: a capture (to carry the bait), a valuable spring, a skinny rod said as "the hammer," a retaining bar to guard the hammer in position, and a platform to mount the catch. If any this variety of aspects is lacking, the mechanism gained't artwork. each and each and every individual area is quintessential. The mousetrap is irreducibly complicated. In end, Darwin theory is fallible and a fallacy. that's if truth be told a theory that calls for very a lot of religion to position self assurance in such stupidity or walk in blindfold. No scientists contained in the global may supply any data of this theory to-date ! even as college textual content books were invaded with this Darwin's lie, making our little ones extra stupid contained in the college.
2016-11-23 19:06:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by watkin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You answered your own question, Silly...If mankind were more ape-like before, then they are not like that any longer...Acknowledging a distinction between the two is acknowledging the existance of evolution.
2006-11-13 02:28:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by biology_nerd_76 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are developing .
This is a selective process, not every thing changes.
We are changing but slowly, it is predicted that we will have only one Eye.
We will all be cyclops.
2006-11-12 19:42:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by minootoo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we evolved from apes, why are there still apes?? Read "Darwin's Black Box"" interesting read...
2006-11-12 19:34:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by steinwald 4
·
0⤊
0⤋