Without a doubt! Many deserving teams will get shut out. For example, Wisconsin, who is currently 8th in the BCS cannot play in a BCS game because a conference can only bring a max of 2 teams. What a shame. Also, with so much league inparity, the thought of Lousiville or Rutgers going to the "championship game" base solely on record and a computer score is scary. Let them play it out!!!
2006-11-12 15:44:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Count 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many games you plan on watching????
The season would be way too short, or you would draw out the season. There is a reason college basketball has March Madness - too many teams!
It would be a statistician's nightmare to figure out who is going into the playoffs, and what the criteria is. I mean, how many teams are ranked out of the top 10 with only 1 loss? You gonna exclude them due to their schedule toughness? And the fairness for the smaller schools would not be there.
Until they can come up with a fair system, I say leave things the way they are right now.
2006-11-12 15:45:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, how can anyone decide which one loss team will face the winner of Michigan v Ohio State. It is a shame that if they do not get a rematch. It will prove that under the current system its does not matter if you lose just when you lose. You will never have a real National Champion unless you go to a playoff.
2006-11-12 15:26:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by jam169 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say no playoffs, that would ruin college football. Think about it, every game in college is like a playoff game right now.
All this talk is what has always made college football as exciting as it is.
2006-11-12 16:15:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by WestCoastin4Life 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the BCS is the best we'll ever get because of economic benefits for the major conferences who get up to 8 guaranteed bowl slots and the presence of the bowl system for decades (tradition)
2006-11-12 17:54:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i say they keep the bcs, but the top 4 teams have a playoff
2006-11-12 15:23:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hunter G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeap, we need a playoff system like the NFL. But someone there in the NCAA hasn't realized that we ain't living in the 20th Century anymore. They should chop his head off.
2006-11-12 15:41:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by ramz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The BCS is a scam....a crock of crap.
The only way to prove who is tops, is to have a playoff system, just as in any other sport.
2006-11-12 15:26:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. I'd watch much more college football if I knew there would be an undisputed champ at the end.
2006-11-12 15:32:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by truthyness 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes because the BCS is overated.
2006-11-12 15:53:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by golfboy349 1
·
0⤊
0⤋