Should parents be allowed to beat their children?

Question

i need some good answers because this is for my project so please no silly answers please!

Answer 1

BEAT??? Of course not. I am not against a spanking when done properly, though, under the right circumstance. (A spanking defined as--one or two smacks with an open hand on the tush.)

Answer 2

Honestly you have got to get the term beat off of your position paper or it has no merit. I assume the debate is about spanking which is different , big time then the horrors of child abuse are brought to mind with the word beating. I think it is the parents choice to spank or not. I have a daughter and have never nor would I ever spank her, I just feel uneasy about being a strong guy. I know my wife has done it and thinks it works well for her, but I still think she feels a bit lousy about doing it after. I do not think like some people that it causes deep emotional harm. Plus you have to back your wife's play right, be consistent. I love them both so much, I just want them to be as happy as possible. I admit I am lame in the discipline department, some of the lunacy just makes me laugh when I know i should pretend to be angry.

Answer 3

The only experience that I have seen when parents beat their children is their children become very afraid of them. I think that there are other ways to punish the child, but not beating them. If you feel like you do have to spank them on the butt then do it when you are not angry. You should explain to the child that they did something wrong and when the parent is not so angry the parent is going to spank them on the butt. But as far as my opinion I will not spank my children. My daughter is 5 years old and time out has worked very well for her. And if time out does not work then I take away privileges like watching movies or TV, playing on the Internet, going to play at the park and so on. My father used to beat me when I was a child and the only thing that got me was being afraid to tell him when I did do something wrong. It would not stop me from doing something wrong in a sense.

Answer 4

Of Course Not..You Have Children To Love, Not To Beat. I Hate It When Parents Beat Their Children, B/c When They Get Older, They Are More Apt To Beat People Up, Or Be Women Beaters. I'm Against Parents Who Beat Their Children..!

Answer 5

No parent should be allowed to BEAT their child. However I see nothing wrong with a proper spanking. To me a spanking falls into the abuse category when a child is left with marks, or when a parent spanks a child in anger. A child should never be left with a bruise, NEVER. If a parent spanks a child in anger, they are more likely to go overboard. I spank my child, but I save spankings for REALLY important issues. Mainly if what he is doing could be harmful to him or someone else. I feel like so many parents out there are scared to spank their kids, or really discipline them in any way. It's upsetting to think that the whole world is horrified by most children's behavior, but they think it's wrong to spank your child. I say to each his own, as long as children are being properly spanked, and not beaten, so be it.

For all of you who say that spanking causes violent behavior--- I was spanked as a child-- I have never been violent with anyone in my life, and I certainly do not allow my husband to beat on me. My siblings and I are living proof that it causes no harm. Once you reach a certain age you are responsible for your own actions, I don't care how many times you say your parents beat you. You cannot blame the actions you take on your childhood.

Answer 6

No. I think you have the two things confused.

beat- hit repeatedly: to hit somebody or something with repeated heavy blows

spank- slap the buttocks: to strike somebody, usually on the buttocks with the open hand in punishment

They are two very very different things. I don't think (and it's not legal) it's okay for parents to "beat" their children. It is assault and abuse.

I do, however, think spanking is okay as a last resort. I believe if parents instill and enforce good behavior at an early age their is little need for spanking. I think consistency is the most important aspect of discipline--not spanking. It has been proved that spanking can be an effective form of discipline but I do not use that method on my own children.

Answer 7

Well, exactly what do you mean by beat? I believe that parents should be able to spank their children. Not like how my parents were, they got beat with everything from belts to hands. I believe a simple spanking is good, because without discipline, a person is nothing but a lazy bum.

Answer 8

No. A parent should never beat their child. The term "beat" means hitting in anger and without awareness or self control......So of course this is abuse and parents are subject to protective service involvement including removal of the child from the home who engage in the is practice becasuse of the sever emotional trauma it causes not to mention the risk of injury including death even accidentally.... Other methods are more effective and do not teach the child to deal with problems and frustrations with aggression; therefore the child does not get in trouble for hitting friends.......

Answer 9

No, parents should not be allowed to beat their children. That would fall under abuse, I don't care how hard or light you beat the child, it is still classified as abuse. Beating a child can possibly give them emotional/mental problems later on as they mature. My point is, people should never be beat on for anything.

Answer 10

I don't think there is ever an instance where it is necessary that someone beats their child. Oh, the occasional spank when they have done something bad or harmful to themselves or others, but beating children is never an OK in my book.

Answer 11

moms and dads could not be allowed to conquer children contained in the first position. i'm not speaking about spanking a small baby both, i'm speaking about draconian sorts of punishment alongside with hitting problematic contained in the mouth and nostril, beating with products etc. which could not be allowed to ensue and it is not ideal.