2006-11-12 13:27:53 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Impeaching him would be too easy on him!
He should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity !
That is still to good for him.
He should have his wife and children raped in front of him then have them skinned alive.
Then He should be skinned alive and salt poured in the wounds.
That Still doesn't come even close to what should be done to him.
He should be tortured very slowly all the while telling him,"Well if this doesn't kill you it really isn't torture".
I hope there is a special wicked place in that theological place of eternal punishment where he will be tormented until there is no hydrogen or helium left in the entire universe.
For those who say he has done nothing wrong there is not enough space on the entire internet to go into all that he has done wrong.
Let us start with him lying about his relationship with a gay hooker .
But that is so minor that it really does not matter what he does in his personal life so let us go to him lying about the reasons for the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq.
Then We can go into his illegal spying on Americans, Illegal profiteering by his corperate buddies in these wars.
I should go on & on & on & on but there is no way that what I type here is going to make any difference.
Those yellow bellied spineless democrates(poorer republicans) will not likely do anything to upset him much and the worse thing that will probably happen to him is a stern look in his direction and maybe a polite talking to.
2006-11-12 14:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by concerned_earthling 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think the Democratic leadership has other things they want to do first.
I also believe the people who think Bush and others have committed 'high crimes and misdemeaners' will keep clamoring for hearings until they are held.
There are arguments on both sides as to it being a good thing or not.
If the people lobby congress more than the big money players do it could happen but the people will have to lobby and also convince their fellow Americans who do not see what he has done wrong.
2006-11-12 23:59:05 · answer #2 · answered by iowamystic 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good. When Bill Clinton left the office of President the National Deficit was zero and he is considered the worst President even though George Bush the dad had the Deficit up to over 7 trillion dollars. GW Bush was in office one year and the National Deficit climbed to over 3 and half trillion dollars, most of which was/is waste on porkbarrel politics or gone into GW's and his cronies pockets. So, yes impeachment should probably happen to him, but he needs prison time too. If you didn't know it when the Savings and Loan fiasco happened, three guys were cited and the ringleader was GWBush, but his dad was President and after the first day no newpaper or news station ever mentioned his name again. And the other two guys were given prison sentences of 6 months in country club prisons.
2006-11-12 21:34:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Unwise and intelligent conduct is not impeachable. A president must violate the Constitution of the United States to be impeachable. Unilateralism (which consequently produces international animus and division), ignorance of human rights, grossly increasing the federal debt, affirming the rights of a glob of cells over the rights of 40 year-old adults and getting thousands of Americans slaughtered in foreign wars are merely stupid, not unconstitutional.
2006-11-12 21:39:47 · answer #4 · answered by voltaire 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No ~ First thing which is very Important. The terrorist are very interested in our politics, if we impeach Bush then we are giving them the impression that they are winning the war. Is this the message we want to give?
Second ~ Everything he has done it had to go through Congress first to get their approval, he has not done anything illegal.
2006-11-13 11:27:17 · answer #5 · answered by beaner 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nothing that he has done rises to the Constitutional definition of 'Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes or Misdemeanors.' However, he did violate the law, and the Constitution, by supporting wiretapping against US citizens without a judge's warrant.
He should not be impeached. He should be arrested. But I would be OK if they waited until after his term was up, as long as the statute of limitations didn't run out.
2006-11-12 21:34:13 · answer #6 · answered by Chredon 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
It's not gonna happen...it will just waste a crap load of money trying, much like the infamous BJ impeachment try with Clinton...
2006-11-12 21:31:35 · answer #7 · answered by BellyRubz 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
On what charges?Lying about wmd's..,if thats the case then we need to recall sen clinton,sen kennedy,sen kerry and all the rest that said he had wmd's and that saddam was a threat..,sorry it wont hold water.And if the democrats go through with it after telling the american public they wont,there will be hell to pay next election,and they will prove that they are not concerned with the issues at hand,all they are concerned about is the hatred for Bush.Get over it.
2006-11-12 21:34:03 · answer #8 · answered by halfbright 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Another Bush basher asking a question that must have been asked and answered 100 times.
With everything going on in the world is this truly the best question regarding politics you can figure out to ask?
You're probably a bright person...give it some thought and ask a question that hasn't been asked over and over and over......
Oh yeah, to answer your Q...no.
2006-11-12 21:35:18 · answer #9 · answered by iraq51 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Let the Time take its course,No use of the haste,American image is already at the lowest point ever in its history.
2006-11-12 21:40:31 · answer #10 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋