William S. Burroughs wrote Naked Lunch, by the way. I vote for The Great Gatsby.
2006-11-12 13:47:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by desdemona othello 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anything by Charles Dickens, but most notably, A Tale of Two Cities. The idea of the story was great, but it was way too long. A person could just read the last 150 pages and get the entire plot. Most of his books are like that.
2006-11-12 21:07:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Great Gatsby. Ugh. Also The Red Badge of Courage.
2006-11-12 13:57:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Emily C 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
At least half the stuff that Philip Roth has written in the past fifteen years. Why do critics think this guy walks on water?
2006-11-12 13:30:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by MelissaQ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As far as classics go, I would have to say Pride and Prejudice. I know that many people love it, but I DESPISED the book.
In the newer novels, however, I would probably have to say Eragon. I think I read two chapters and got bored.
2006-11-12 13:36:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by isayssoccer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Little Women, Jane Eyre, Great Expectations - these 'classics' bored me beyond belief
2006-11-12 14:52:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by canuckgal49 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Great Gatsby, I'm lost after the second page.
2006-11-12 13:11:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by raisenet 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Ulysses" and "Finnigan's Wake" by James Joyce. The writing is so incredibly complicated and obtuse. I don't get why some people consider them some of the greatest works of fiction. Most of the time you don't even know what's going on.
2006-11-13 04:09:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by devakara12170 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I can't name a classic, because if for no other reason they have been read for decades, so I'd have to go with "The Davinci Code." Not that good.
2006-11-12 13:33:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Catcher in the Rye. After I read it, I was like, O.K.? It seems like something a pre-teen would read. What was so great about it?
2006-11-12 13:22:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Butterfly Princess 4
·
0⤊
0⤋