Nothing. We won't see until years later how good he was. Abraham Lincoln was considered a bad president doing his time. Now we love him. The fact that people don't like him is they listen to the liberal news and the walk around repeating what the news told them, so they think they sound smart. If these people were to research a little on their own, they would see what the President is doing is good. Just take a look at this post, how many say bad things about the president. Some don't even give reasons, the just use lame excuses and say bad things about the President of the United States.
2006-11-12 12:45:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by hawks1322 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Let's see. I wouldn't say he is the "worst". But Bush absolutely hates bipartisanship unless he is forced into it. He deceives the people about domestic and especially foreign issues (the war). He violates the 4th Amendment and international law because he says he needs to "protect the homeland". He starts an unwinnable war in Iraq for no real reason, spending more than half a trillion $. His poor planning creates more terrorists world-wide and he never admits his mistakes.
2006-11-12 12:36:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Only people who have no knowledge of US history would say such a thing. Regardless of one's feelings regarding the President, he's far from the worst. I suggest you read a little bit on such luminaries as John Quincy Adams, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Ulysses Grant, and Warren Harding.
2006-11-12 12:38:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rick N 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
well let us break this down:war in Iraq=FAILURE.Hurricanes Katrina and Rita=FAILURE.border security=FAILURE.appointing Tom Brown as head of F.E.M.A. when he was an Arabian horse show organizer=FAILURE.education=FAILURE.Afghanistan=FAILURE.wow just look at what a great President he could have been if he would of worried about this country instead of him self.instead the above mentioned are just a few reasons to answer your question.
2006-11-12 13:08:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by crazywildman1 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
His politics have retarded the development of science and health.
For example, the Government does not favour compulsory immunisation of girls against Human Papiloma Virus - because they say removing the risks of this sexually transmitted disease will encourage promiscuity.
The immunisation will save 5000 lives every year - from women who would otherwise get uterine cancer. It would save billions of dollars in health care.
But Bush would rather see these women die in pain from overian cancer and be able to say to the others "this is what happens because you slept around."
Were an HIV immunisation to become available, Bush would take the same position - let the people who have premarital sex die slowly from AIDs as punishment - and let it be a warning to the others to practice abstinence.
Bush and his moral majority have put science and medecine in this country into a stagnation from which it will take years to recover.
2006-11-12 12:39:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pastor Sauce 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
He acts stupid(when he's from Yale) He acts like hes from Texas(when hes not) he says hes a christian(when really hes a member of s&b).The rest have been mentioned.Hes not the worst,but he is not the best guy ever..
2006-11-12 12:48:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Myaloo 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Although I am not a Bush supporter, I cannot say he is the worst US president.
At least his secret presidential tapes will not have gaps transcribed as "expletive. Deleted"
2006-11-12 12:40:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by elaine_classen 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The fact that he screwed up so bad his father has had to step in and take over running things for his son, through his proxies.
2006-11-12 15:17:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fact that everyone says he is even though other facts shows that this is not true?
2006-11-12 13:06:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by High-strung Guitarist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not call him the worst. But he is in the top twenty
2006-11-12 12:37:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by part time 3
·
2⤊
2⤋