If Bush and Blair were not in power.
2006-11-12 12:22:48 · 26 answers · asked by technocase 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely it would be, If Bill Clinton was allowed additional terms as President, he would be President right now.
2006-11-16 04:39:25 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know about Blair, but anyone who thinks Bush is the brains behind this operation is sadly mistaken. He is so obviously just a puppet for the people who are really running the show. Dance puppet, sell the war puppet, link iraq and 9-11 in the minds of the people puppet, stir up patriotism for the war puppet,
2006-11-12 20:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It not anything wrong with Bush or Blair.It is wrong US policy.The US decisions are made by Arms Manufacturing Lobby.Inorder to sell arms and keep the industry in good shape America has to intervene somewhere always.It is this policy that has to be changed.Even before Bush there were interventions(eg Vietnam)>even after Bush it will be,probably Korea.
2006-11-13 03:35:36 · answer #3 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No matter the politician in power there is always someone who will not back them or their policies. There has also not been a prime minister or president who has not made mistakes at some point.
Personally I do not feel that the world would be better, the Taliban would still be in power in Afganistan, Saddam would still be killing his own population.Yes, our military is involved in dangerous areas around the world, but it always has been. There will always be war zones and we will always have those who do not back our government.
2006-11-13 08:11:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is very difficult to answer.
Some believe terrorism would not have grown so much had these two not stirred it up. Others think terrorism would overrun civilization if they did not provide the fight.
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle, a wash. Without these two, the world would be about the same in terms how good, just different.
2006-11-12 20:30:25 · answer #5 · answered by Action 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, that would very much depend on who you would replace them with. If we want to keep things Muppet-based, Waldorf and/or Stadtler would make a good Bush replacement and perhaps Miss Piggy for the UK.
2006-11-12 20:28:42 · answer #6 · answered by f0xymoron 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush and Blair rock ,,,both are the maddest of cows ,and set the fields on fire...dancing with the mad cows...so ya ,better place for the strong ones...cherrs
2006-11-12 21:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes for 2
2006-11-13 06:54:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is always some other **** waiting to take the place of the wanker, so yes and no, its the same really, a whole lot of twatty wankers.
2006-11-15 08:08:03 · answer #9 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
blair just had a major penis cramp give him a break but bush, yea we wud be havin a ball if he was gone
2006-11-12 20:28:03 · answer #10 · answered by lex1979x 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋