http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061112/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
2006-11-12 11:55:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Democrats only promised their VOTERS that they would get us out of Iraq...they sang a totally different tune to the President of Iraq when he was here in September...
From: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/09/africa/ME_GEN_Iraq_President.php
THe article begins:
HEADLINE: Iraqi president says Democrats told him they will not pull out quickly
The Associated Press
President Jalal Talabani said Thursday that he had been assured by Democrat congressional leaders during a recent visit to Washington that they would continue to support the government here and had not (sic) plans for a quick withdrawal from Iraq.
But surprise, surprise, the Democrats were talking out of both sides of their mouths... their voters thought this election meant that we're getting out of there soon? Ha Ha, SUCKERS! The Dems obviously have no intention of pulling out
2006-11-12 16:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dude. Going by those solutions from the Dems, you may imagine they pay really NO interest to what "their" leaders say virtually weekly, if not daily. one among their personal (his call escapes me) honestly reported that if Patreus's record got here decrease back solid in any kind or style, it would want to be undesirable information for them. they'd the Dem senate really calling Patreus a liar, highly Clinton, to quote her, "this record is the prepared suspension of disbelief". If the Iraqi progression receives a lot more effective, no matter if in a unmarried three hundred and sixty 5 days or ten years, the Dems recognize for a shown truth that the Reps receives all the credit, and they could't stand that, now that they have got opened their enormous mouths on the opposite.
2016-11-29 02:08:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It certainly will increase the violence in Iraq, if Democrats decide to withdraw troops completely from Iraq. America is filling a very big vacuum by its presence in Iraq and just to pack and leave will be a big blow to America's image and reputation as a super power and will most definitely help terrorist backed organizations such as Al-Qaida to consolidate its power base in Iraq, since the Iraqi government, in its present condition , will be no match to Al-Qaida and its affiliates to restore security and stability to the country and thus, cahos and anarchy will prevail.
2006-11-12 12:29:09 · answer #3 · answered by Rafi S 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dems won't take control of anything till jan. 07!!! Already trying to blame it on us, huh?! I don't blame you though,you must be totally devastated by the election results. No dear, the Iraq situation has been worsening with every passing day while bush and company keep adding to the deficit without any sort of oversight on spending! You allowed a civil war to break out in that indefensible country! Shame on you neo-cons!!!
2006-11-12 12:10:54 · answer #4 · answered by liberalthinktank 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't know, that sounds like an average day in Iraq. I'm just glad you are finally paying attention to it instead of condemning it as the "liberal" media...
2006-11-12 12:04:59 · answer #5 · answered by John J 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. We have not had any real control in Iraq since 2004.
2006-11-12 12:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
159 died today. I thought when the demoquacks got in there the terrorists were going to love everyone.
2006-11-12 12:02:34 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. They are happy only because Bush's party lost.
2006-11-12 12:33:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure it did. It gives the bad guys hope.
2006-11-12 11:59:14 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
do you think.
2006-11-12 12:00:19 · answer #10 · answered by roger k 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋