Do you think the movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" was a fake?

Question

If you do, explain why please.

Answer 1

no, it is absolutely factual. people who are Bush supporters will try to convince themselves it is fake, but they know it is true.

Answer 2

Non-followers do not take excitement in what the wrestlers do because they in spite of the actuality that that only because action stars avert bullets, surviving an explosion or capturing human beings, it means to them that the roles of those human beings take extra danger yet like what the guy on excellent suggested, they use stunt doubles. also, action video clips are a techniques extra time-honored contained in the known public because they have a respected director, accepted solid, attractive females, a cop, helping roles of diverse age, nationality and knowledgeable human beings. regrettably non-followers do not see that WWE has each and everything of that too and they go back and forth the line accepted. maximum non-followers imagine that professional wrestling is largely roar, punch and slam yet like you've suggested proceed to compliment really action video clips. they don't look to note that WWE abilities prepare problematic not only actual yet honestly an articulate public speaker. The extra upsetting area is that non-followers also compliment drama actors very a lot. Non-followers were not conscious that WWE abilities are able to doing a similar interest because they seem to be a blend of a fighter, actor, variety, range not chaotic belligerent giants.

Answer 3

I don't have enough space to write every single piece of information that was a lie in that film. One of the biggest is where Moore talks about Bush invading Afghanistan because he wanted to put a pipeline thru the middle of the country,and that Haliburton would get the contract. The fact is the pipeline plan was originally put in place by the Clinton administration,but Bush ditched that plan when he took office,and had plans to go around the country of Afghanistan because he did not want to deal with the Taliban government which was in control of Afghanistan. Moore also claimed that Iraq was a nation that "had never attacked the United States. A nation that had never threatened to attack the United States, but in reality Saddam order his police to murder former American President George Bush when he visited Kuwait City in 1993; they attempted to do so, but failed. , (which president Clinton retaliated with a airstrike against Iraq when the plan was discovered) In 1991he ordered his agents to murder the American Ambassador to the Philippines and, separately, to murder the employees of the U.S. Information Service in Manila; they tried, but failed.On November 25, 2000, Saddam declared in a televised speech, "The Arab people have not so far fulfilled their duties. They are called upon to target U.S. and Zionist interests everywhere and target those who protect these interests." Moore is a commie liar,and anyone who believes that piece of filth Fahrenheit 9/11 needs to learn how to do some research for themselves

Answer 4

What was presented is along the right lines. But it only scratched the surface of what is really true.
It didn't provide any real evidence that the government carried out the entire operation, and then covered up the story with faked videos and false evidence, as well as hiding much other factual evidence related to disappearing planes, miracle jet fuel melting steel, born-again hijackers etc etc etc

Answer 5

Fake as Hollywood and as fake as the fat little pork-a-bob dude who directed it.

"The Blair Witch Project" was more of a documentary than Fahrenheit 9/11 and it had way more talent.

Answer 6

I don't know if I would say it's "fake" but it is CERTAINLY bias. Remember you're only seeing one side of the story, and that it is being exaggerated to the max. Don't believe everything you hear, read, or see in mainstream media, it is ALL bias, and influenced.

Answer 7

No absolutely not, and at least Michael Moore had the gall and brains to present such a film

Answer 8

No, it was a real movie. Sure, some of it was shot on video, which some film purists get all uppity about, but to them I say, DIE! DIE! DIE! Your film purist days are numbered! Long live the new digital cinema! But to answer your question, yes it was a real movie.

Answer 9

It was unfortunately quite true. There is a slant to it, yes, but it presented nothing but facts. Facts that make a pretty ugly picture of who owns and controls the government of this country.

Answer 10

It was 100% a FAKE

Answer 11

No, it was not fake, but then again nor should it be viewed as 100% factual, because it is a one-sided piece, not a balanced, evenhanded piece with opportunities for balanced debate. In its own way, it was a piece of propaganda, based on facts and halftruths.