He believes that children at a young age develop an insestuous love for their mother/father and thinks about killing the opposite gender. And that everything relates to sex.
He is one sick pervert! I know he's dead now but still. His incest children theory is the sickest.
2006-11-12 11:34:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I don't care that they call him the father of psychology, I don't consider him so. The man's theories are completely invalid becasue he based them on his own frustrations. Freud was impotent. If y ou base your theories only on your negative experiences, they're failed theories, because they're not objective.
2006-11-12 17:02:08 · answer #1 · answered by Ex-presidente inteligente 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Freud was all about sex - can we say fixation. Not everything is sexual. yet when it comes down to it some of us can separate sex and life more than others. We are just animals after all.
2006-11-12 22:06:31 · answer #2 · answered by True 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, that actually is a very good summary of his life and observations -- puts his personal characteristics in a very concise form.
2006-11-12 20:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by sglmom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Freud was a momma's boy!
2006-11-12 23:53:54 · answer #4 · answered by daisymay 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course he was, but then again, based on Freudian theory, so are you!
And what is Andastra shaking!?!?!?!?!?!? Freud gives you a slippery slope!
2006-11-12 19:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Brian L 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He was pretty sexist. His penis envy theory just leaves me shaking my head.
2006-11-12 19:44:52 · answer #6 · answered by Andastra 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
overly extreme reaction would you care for a grain of salt at least until you properly frame his intentions ....
2006-11-12 22:25:17 · answer #7 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He wasn't incestuous because he didn't have sex with his siblings.
Although he was preoccupied with sex he didn't actually act out on any of those tendencies. To be a sexaholic you actually have to have sex a lot.
And he wasn't a pig. That's just rude name calling.
Grow up why don't you! Just because he was wrong it doesn't make him a monster.
2006-11-12 19:41:01 · answer #8 · answered by Dysthymia 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I don't think he was sick. He contributed greatly to Psychology movement.
2006-11-12 19:43:17 · answer #9 · answered by Mayonaise 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
your conclusion about feud comes from a religion point of view
so its not objective,its just a fundamental concept in human
behavior science,don't take it personal
2006-11-12 20:33:56 · answer #10 · answered by Byzantino 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋