I know you liberals think I'm just a "neocon nut job", but even I think it was just a ratings fueled media scandal
2006-11-12 11:13:11 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No they were long overdue. Now that was a crook in the highest order and very good at covering his tracks. I think the ba%tard should have been put in jail with his wife along at his side.
2006-11-12 11:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 9⤋
do not care that he labored for Freddie Mac or that he had a huge credit account with Tiffanys. He had to generate income, and that i don't care if he's rich or how he spends his funds. Newt has confessed his affairs, well-known duty for his 2 failed marriages, and asked forgiveness from those he harmed and from God. i'm solid. observe his affairs weren't serial womanizing, yet him only falling in love with different women folk, and then marrying them because of the fact of that love. Newt grew to become into railroaded on that ethics violation. Later examine by ability of the IRS stumbled on no incorrect doing. See the CNN tale i'm linking to. distinctive people supported the TARP bailout. this is not against the regulation you comprehend. Even to on the instant i'm uncertain if it grew to become into mandatory or wasteful. there is only no thank you to comprehend what could have occurred if we hadn't carried out that. enable me help you comprehend why I do like Newt Gingrich: a million. spectacular! the guy has greater clean new techniques in an afternoon than others have in a 300 and sixty 5 days. 2. is familiar with everybody and each thing approximately each and every thing. 3. shown checklist of working with opposing occasion and getting reforms and balanced budgets by way of Congress. 4. shown chief who lead the GOP to a sweeping victory in 1994. 5. One heck of a debater. 6. supplies you a very good speech sans teleprompter.
2016-10-21 23:45:04 · answer #2 · answered by comesana 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not realize that their was Clinton's impeachment hearings if that true then they were stupid and something that the media wanted. sexually harassment is a serious obsessive crime. He should have been maybe impeach looking at her point I would not want a president that comments sexually harassment crimes, so I don't want him as president period yes he should of been impeached. truthfully you should put Clinton in jail with wife. then you should put his whole admiration. Then you should put bush senior and bush junior and the admiration in jail also. Maybe we get a new president soon that will be good.
2006-11-12 11:27:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes this was nothing more than a joke.the first sign that the republicans had too much power.40 million dollars to impeach a man for denying he had an affair.not one person with half of brain that was guilty of this would admit it,especially world wide.this was a waist of not only the money and the people of America's time,but a waist of a very good leader as well.
2006-11-12 14:08:35 · answer #4 · answered by crazywildman1 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh man! I think what Bush has done is WAY more impeachable than anything Clinton ever did. Clinton should have stood up and said, "Yeah, I hit that. What of it?"
Yes, I think it was ridiculous and I was sooooo tired of hearing about it. Clinton actually did a good job as president. He left us with a record surplus budget and good will around the world. Bush has squandered both.
2006-11-12 11:18:34 · answer #5 · answered by gatheringplace2002 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
A 100% political hatchet job. Sure, lying to the Grand Jury about an embarrassing personal sexual activity was bad but impeachment? C'mon. 100% politcally motivated.
And if the new congress tries to get Bush, I'll say the same thing.
2006-11-12 11:17:34 · answer #6 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
This will go down in history as the most amazing abuse of power ever. I can't wrap my mind around the fact that that piece of trailer trash ever read a small right wing magazine and instantly decided that everyone would know that Paula was her. I can't get over the coincidence of Linda Tripp being so close to Goldberg, a Republican operative whose son now appears on talk shows too. The same Linda who worked for Foster and was "best friends" with Monica. Washington must be awfully small for so many coincidences. Lets not forget the woman who claims she was 'raped' by Clinton, and had bruises on her neck, my momma used to call then hickeys, and I would imagine she had considerable explaining to do since she told her husband she didn't have a lover, and her lover she wasn't sleeping with her husband. And Clinton was in town that week, maybe. As to Whitewater....it had already been investigated several times before Clinton ever got to Washington, it was just a hang-your-hat-excuse, for the vengeance driven right wing.
2006-11-12 11:33:20 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I thought it was stupid! I was very angry that they ran him through the mill like that over what? Yes he lied to a grand jury but it should never have gotten that far in the first place. If the democrats try to do the same with bush I will feel the same way
2006-11-12 11:30:05 · answer #8 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yea. It was a giant waste of money. It shows how desperate some zealots are. Now they are whining about the election results.... the Onion reported that the republicans are blaming the democrats for their losing the election. Seems the Dems knocked on doors and said bad things about them and they want to make the dems stop it..... Pot Kettle Black comes to mind.
I want to know why these same people refuse to even consider impeaching GWB.... Why is that? I am certain there are more and better crimes GWB committed.... time will tell.
2006-11-12 11:15:32 · answer #9 · answered by ??IMAGINE ?? 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
The cost of investigating Clinton was something like $42 million.
The cost of investigating 9/11 was only $16 million.
Which deserved more of the taxpayers' money?
2006-11-12 11:25:29 · answer #10 · answered by Rob in NY 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not really, I mean I don't think many people thought he should have been impeached because of an extra marital affair, but he did lie under oath, and for that reason he should have been impeached, and was in the House of Representatives.
2006-11-12 11:21:43 · answer #11 · answered by billy d 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋