I've been searching all day and can't seem to find it. Its strange though, because impeachment is only able to be carried out if a law has been broken...
Please provide the law, not some website or any personal opinions. These won't get someone impeached. A broken law will
2006-11-12 11:05:22 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Lordkelvin, going by your logic, breathin is illegal because there is no law saying it isnt
2006-11-12 11:08:36 · update #1
Ok, sorry Lordkevlin, you changed your answer, I digress
2006-11-12 11:09:50 · update #2
I told a lie this big...I don't want to read a website called "impeachbush.com"
I asked for a law, not some biased website with no credibility
2006-11-12 11:14:35 · update #3
Iraq-didnt the Dems vote for it too and proudly, especially Kerry. This is a stupid question. Is there a law to prevent a lying, soldier-bashing person from running from pres? no. Why would Dems want to impeach Bush? Do like Cheney that much-ha.
2006-11-12 11:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
International law - it is illegal, immoral and unethical to invade a sovereign country. Bush thinks he's exempt but he's not.
Bush should not be impeached - his entire administration (including but not limited to Dubya, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Alberto Gonzalez, Ashcroft, Libby and Rove) should all be indicted in the World Court in the Hague or in the UN war crimes office, for war crimes and crimes against humanity, just like Hitler's administration was indicted and tried for war crimes after WWII.
2006-11-12 16:01:37 · answer #2 · answered by spongeworthy_us 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What law are you talking about to begin with? Roman law? The law of the land? What land? That is the question...
My guess international law would have some kind of provision on violating the sovereignty of a country. But then again, who is overseeing it?
2006-11-12 11:32:12 · answer #3 · answered by oksana_rossi 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't worry, the libs have been looking for the same thing for about four years now with no results. I have personally looked and I can't find a thing. There is a rumor floating around that the President is some kind of Commander in Chief. I don't know what that is though. Some kind of leader in the military. LOL.
2006-11-12 11:29:29 · answer #4 · answered by RIDLEY 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Either ALL wars are legal or ILLEGAL. All wars are the same. It's a WAR. How the hell can that be law-abiding?
Leo-Girl: Democridiots. Lmao, nice.
Rosbif-WTF is "International-Law?"
Even if we weren't there, the Mid-East would still be in turmoil. They've been going at it for hundreds of years. They've tried to uproot each other's gov't.
Yellow Man: At the time no one knew it was a lie, moron.
2006-11-12 11:25:29 · answer #5 · answered by Picard Facepalm 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No law was broken, but if Bush did lie well there is no law against lying, only if your under oath or lie to an investigator, like Martha.
2006-11-12 11:25:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well if it is illegal then we need to go after all those Democrats in congress who voted for it and now say it is a bad idea. I know, I know, they voted for it based on lies told by George Bush about the WMD's. Well lets pull out of Iraq and see how you like having an Iranian nuke shoved up your butt or watching another attack by Al-Queda on a major American City
2006-11-12 11:22:04 · answer #7 · answered by Brennan Huff 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
There is no such law!!! Congress approved the Presidents actions and by the democrats logical thinking, they too should be held responsible!!!! Both Republicans and Democrats!!
2006-11-12 11:22:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Thank-you! I'm so glad to have someone point this out! The war isn't illegal and I figure it will take the Democrats at least 2 yrs to come up with one they can all agree on and even longer to figure out how to twist a good law into one they can use to do it with! They are angry we are saying these things except they've said it over and over and over so why wouldn't we?
2006-11-12 11:15:06 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What Hitler did was considered lawful at the time but history changed everyone's view of that part of history.
2006-11-12 11:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋