debate on cons of prenuptial agreements?

Question

i need help with my debate.
i know that there arent many cons to prenuptial agreements. i would love any help possible. thanks.

Answer 1

Here is the only "con" I know of in a pre-nup:

To make a pre-nup legally binding it MUST include full disclosure on both sides. So if your plan is to be an a**hole and keep your own little nest egg to yourself...how do that and still get her (or him) to sign it?

There's:
No hiding of current assets- like your boat-home-and 3 cars, no socking it away in joint bank accounts with your first wife (to "borrow" back from her later), no pretend inheritances to explain how you showed up with $ 60,000 CASH and then "had" to give it to the 1st wife, etc, etc.

Financial responsibilities would be agreed upon in a pre-nup. So how do you get her to marry you when you spell it out IN ADVANCE that you want to "shack up" in marriage and dodge any sort of joint care? You want a marriage that says "separate checks please".

And if we knew it in advance - that we are welcome in your bed but not in your wallet- we'd scream RAPE as you yell PICKPOCKET.

Answer 2

There is a con if both parties do not have equally good respresentation and legal advise. Many men try to get pre nups that leave the woman little or nothing, not talking into consideration what she gave up. A man who thinks its "Only fair" that he keeps what is his after a divorce, but expected the wife to give up her job or move etc. is being selfish. A woman who negotiates for half of everything and only intends on being married for a year is greedy. Condiditons change and if set amounts are in the agreement the other person can stand to loose a lot if the financial picture changes. Love is blind and sometimes we trust more than we should. Its why you both need separate legal representation. Do it yourself can be a nightmare in the end if one partner is manipulating the other.

Answer 3

properly this is a sturdy element for the guy who has materials to guard in case issues flow awry. It only rather a lot potential the different man or woman wont get a million/2 or greater of your materials on a whim. cons are it may look such as you're installation for divorce already. this isn't any longer real regardless of the undeniable fact that. you may desire to speak to a legal expert approximately what this is tht is being risk-free and why. stable success to you.

Answer 4

My boyfriend and I moved in together and bought a home. My lawyer insisted on a quazi-pre-nup. I thought it was ridiculous because I thought, "I'm not buying a home with him because I don't think it'll work out!" But...it didn't work out and our fights got petty and dirty. Thank GOD we had that document to split everything 50/50. Legally, he had to give me 50% of the property and reimburse me for things I got rid of to accommodate his furniture. In the end, I only took a portion of what I was entitled to because I felt it was only right to only take what I had monetarily invested. But the pre-nup protected me from ending up with nothing and kept it from dragging on FOREVER.

We're friends now and he even helped me choose a neighborhood to find my new home in. I think sometimes that the document helped us salvage a bit of the integrity of our friendship before things got really bad.

Answer 5

I can think of no cons.... It is to protect assets for both parties...

A con would be if you were a horrible person marrying for money and now because of the prenup you get exactly what you have coming..NOTHING !!!

Answer 6

I don't know of any con's to pre-nups...
Pre-nups can be modified / changed at any time
with the agreement of both parties..

Answer 7

Prenups are fine, if both people take it to their own attorneys and have it fairly drawn up.