2006-11-12 10:34:06 · 30 answers · asked by cesar lenin m 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
The Undertaker is past his prime. I think Batista is much more muscular. By the way, I think Triple H is a stiff. He's not a good bad guy and he's a bad good guy.
2006-11-12 10:38:43 · answer #1 · answered by DavidNH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is a landslide. Of course it is the Undertaker. Batista is like a rookie in baseball. He is effective, but new. Batista has only been here, for what 2-3 years? This is the Undertaker's 16th year in the WWE. Sure, you could say that the Batista Bomb is vicious. So is the Tombstone Piledriver and The Last Ride. It is downright the Undertaker, because Batista is not as experienced. The Undertaker knows all the tricks of the game. He knows how to stop his opponent from cheating. He has probably competed in every (if not, most) matches the WWE even has AND a Punjabi Prison Match. The Undertaker is the winner by a landslide.
2006-11-12 10:39:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Undertaker is way better than Batista. I like both, but I've been a fan of The Undertaker is I was very young
2006-11-12 11:37:17 · answer #3 · answered by midnightwolf99_2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Undertaker
2006-11-12 11:06:55 · answer #4 · answered by WrizzLe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batista
2006-11-12 10:35:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Undertaker
2006-11-13 10:24:57 · answer #6 · answered by !!!!!!!! 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batista because Undertaker is getting so old now and wwe need to release Undertaker from his contract
2006-11-13 02:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker
2006-11-12 12:09:32 · answer #8 · answered by I_R_A_7 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker has been around a lot longer and is better at wrestling, but Batista is better looking.
2006-11-12 12:54:04 · answer #9 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Undertaker is STILL a fantasic wrestler. Batista is just about as good as John Cena or Hulk Hogan. And by that, I mean "he can't wrestle."
2006-11-12 13:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋