English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i wan to no

2006-11-12 09:30:03 · 8 answers · asked by pookies_rule 1 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

8 answers

The International Astronomical Union decided that Pluto was no longer a planet. The reason is that while Pluto is round, orbits the sun, and has three moons, it has not cleared (via gravity) its own orbit of debris. Instead, they decided to classify it as a "dwarf planet".

See the details below.

RESOLUTION 5A
The IAU therefore resolves that "planets" and other bodies in our Solar System, except satellites, be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:

(1) A "planet" [footnote 1] is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [footnote 2] , (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.

(3) All other objects [footnote 3] except satellites orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar-System Bodies".


Footnote 1: The eight "planets" are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.

Footnote 2: An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.

Footnote 3: These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.

RESOLUTION 6A
The IAU further resolves:

Pluto is a "dwarf planet" by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects.

2006-11-12 13:25:01 · answer #1 · answered by Otis F 7 · 3 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

on 24 august 2006, the international astronomical union reclassified pluto.

pluto does orbit the sun, is ball-shaped, does not have an isolated orbit (a bunch of other similar bodies have similar orbits.), and is not a satellite so it is not a planet.

i have been waiting for this since i was about ten when i learned that pluto didn't fit the pattern set by the major bodies in the solar system so it was an anomaly. it just felt "out of place". now that astronomers have found hundreds of other bodies with similar orbits, classifying "134340 pluto" as a planet is even more irrational. i feel somewhat satisfied, but i don't know how long this will drag on tho. many planetary astronomers are satisfied that the definition is rigorous enuf. i can accept that the definition is flawed, but i can not accept that "134340 pluto" is a planet.

this was the right thing to do, believe me. this does not change anything about pluto or the solar system. this just corrects the mistake of classifying pluto as a planet initially.

many astronomers consider pluto and charon to be a binary system, but two small bodies orbit that system. they are called nix and hydra.

incidentally, "134340 pluto" was never a moon of neptune. neptune did capture triton. this is why triton has a retrograde orbit

2006-11-12 16:09:21 · answer #2 · answered by warm soapy water 5 · 0 0

Pluto got demoted. It is still there but no longer considered as a planet.

2006-11-12 09:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 1 1

Some brainiac know-it-alls demoted Pluto. They think it is too small to be classified as a planet. Err...can they define a planet?

2006-11-12 10:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It was declassified as an 'official planet' a few months ago, possibly due to size and composition. Poor thing. :(

2006-11-12 09:32:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

that is nonetheless there, in northern england, nonetheless getting over being said as eboracum and jorvik contained in the previous. there's a highway in york said as "the shambles". it were given its call because the "flesh handlers" (i.e. butchers) were all there, and had an inclination to throw their garbage in to the line. you may imagine what *that* smelled like. over the centuries "flesh handlers" morphed in to "shambles". i have been to york. being descended from solid yorkshire people myself, i look like the individuals there. they appear as if me. adverse people...

2016-11-29 02:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the USA government blew it up testing a new ray gun thats on the moon we have

2006-11-12 10:50:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

the planet?

2006-11-12 09:31:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers