Assume the big bang occurred out of nothingness. Particles were blown in all directions. But, what if the "explosion" first faced away from us, scattering particles away from us. How could we ever see that light? Isn't it possible that some particles are travelling faster than those we can see (that is those aimed in a different direction than us?
2006-11-12 09:00:17 · 5 answers · asked by David Me 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Since the big bang was an explosion OF space rather than in space, your logic will not work. Wherever you are in the Universe, everything is going away from you.
2006-11-12 10:45:26 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Big Bang created the universe. There is no center to the universe because it wasn't really an explosion. An explosion happens some "where," and before the Big Bang there was no "where;" the Big Bang happened everywhere at once, and we're inside all of that.
There are parts of the universe that we can never observe, along with their contents, like particles, stars, galaxies, etc.,.
2006-11-12 09:47:24 · answer #2 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Big Bang didn't happen in one particular place - it happened everywhere. Before the Big Bang the entire universe - all of SPACE - was in one point. There was nothing outside of that point. So there is no way the Big Bang could have faced away from us - that would imply that we were not part of the Big Bang, that we were outside the Universe at the time of the Big Bang, which is impossible.
2006-11-12 09:41:41 · answer #3 · answered by kris 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, the huge bang did not distribute rely the two, it disbursed potential the two (in the 1st few seconds after the huge bang, it became into to warm for any rely to exist). The potential coalesed into electons, and protons (alongside with the anti-electrons and anti-protons) and, at last neutrons. those evenutally variety hydrogen and helium. at last gravitational allure brought about those to coaless into stars and galaxies (the formation of heavier factors had to attend some generations of stars). (I disregarded lots, yet examine Steven Hawking's "a quick history of Time" for extra suggestions) 2nd: maximum scientist will agree that the possibility (certainly, the risk) of existence on different flowers is possibly. clever existence? that can not be prevalent till communique between us and them is made. What shape have they have been given? lower back, unknown. besides, i don't see any paradox in any of this. . .
2016-10-17 04:57:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right, if it was blown in the a single direction away from us, we probably would never see much.
2006-11-12 09:04:12 · answer #5 · answered by Roman Soldier 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋