English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It should be obvious to anyone who thinks, that the Republicans and Democrats are working as one party in the background and creating the illusion of some sort of difference between them. The evidence available supports that neither of them, the dems or reps, has any intention of doing wht is right for this country. If there were any one thing the Dems could do, to prove their loyalty to the people, it would be to begin impeachment proceedings against the Bush administration. However, they have made no indication that they intend to do so.

Therefore, we are left with only one non-violent option, and that is to vote for a third party president. Would you ever do such a thing?

2006-11-12 08:47:11 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

So far there are SEVEN respondents and I must say, this is the most impressive group of responses EVER, in the history of Yahoo answers. EVERYONE stayed on topic. UNBELIEVABLE. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU.

2006-11-12 09:24:32 · update #1

Best answer so far is the first respondent. The Constitution Party is beyond the shadow of a doubt in my mind, the ONLY choice for 08. We MUST get back to supporting and defending our Constitution if this great nation is to survive.

2006-11-12 09:25:59 · update #2

10 answers

Yes.

I've been encouraging people to get away from the Big Two parties for years. And, this year, even though I'm the state PR coordinator for the Constitution Party, I ran on the Republican Party line (because the CP does not yet have a ballot line in Tennessee).

The GOP did not lift a finger to help my campaign, even though I stand for the same principles that they **claim** to stand for.

The Republicans use conservative Christians the way a wife-beater promises to "change". Sadly, the conservatives respond the way the battered wife does: by trying to "fix" the GOP, instead of getting a divorce. It won't get better until the true conservatives get away from the Republican Party, which is controlled by the "forces of moderation" (read: pro-abortion money).

True conservatives will find a home in the Constitution Party. This is especially true with the formation of the CP's National Veterans Coalition.

Hopefully, neither of the Big Two parties will have an occupant in the White House in the next administration!

2006-11-12 15:59:02 · answer #1 · answered by Tom Kovach, 2006 candidate TN-05 1 · 1 0

What strong does it do to vote third party? Your vote isn't the front internet website information. it received't make a huge difference. you're prepared to to boot not vote. Johnson, Paul, none of those each and each and all of us is ever going to be president of the U. S.. A vote for extremely some the third party applicants is a vote for Obama, and he's the worst, optimal threatening president in historic previous. he's committed to tearing down the monetary equipment that made u . s . wealthy and robust. he's a very good liar (Benghazigate) and has been an enemy to our pals and a chum to our enemies. Solyndra. speedy and furious. Czars. What has he finished for the monetary equipment? Romney is a very good capitalist who has had fulfillment everywhere and receives us again on the song to prosperity and potential as a us of a, even as all Obama receives is larger persons out of artwork and on nutrients stamps.

2016-11-29 02:00:03 · answer #2 · answered by lemanski 4 · 0 0

Dountful they would. I live in Canada where there are 3 large parties and a seperatist party that all have official status and we can not get people to take the third party seriously here either.

People follow the ones where the advertising bucks and the long histories (although corrupt) are.

2006-11-12 08:50:29 · answer #3 · answered by cosmiccastaway 3 · 1 0

YES! that's what I do in 2008. But, as mentioned above, the all mighty advertising dollar goes to the Dem and rep. Most ppl are so uneducated about politics they "listen" to the TV ads. We here know that the ads are BS from both parties.

I'M with you! I hope we all can reach out to many many voters and have them vote other!

Mark

2006-11-12 11:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by mark533789 3 · 1 0

Ross Perot, as a third-party candidate in 1992, scared the beJesus out of the 'Republicrats' by getting 19% of the popular vote. That caused the monopolistic two-party system to meld themselves into one political party that now has a corrupt stranglehold on our system of voting.
Yes, I would vote for a strong third-party candidate in a heartbeat before I'd vote again for a Democrat or Republican.
Both parties are self-serving, and corrupt to the core. -RKO-

2006-11-12 08:53:06 · answer #5 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2 0

Not yet, just because there is not enough strength or methods to keep a world leader in check without a pre-existing,high functioning party behind them.
I hear what you are saying, and I am ready to see some positive changes as well, but I think that is the reality of it right now.

2006-11-12 08:51:03 · answer #6 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 2 0

Sure. But not the "Peace and Freedom" party, and not the Godless "Libertarian" party.

When the "Constitution" party gets on the ballot, they will have my unwaivering support.

And, by the way, there is a difference between the Republican and the Democratic party . . .

They tell different lies.

2006-11-12 08:50:11 · answer #7 · answered by s2scrm 5 · 1 1

Already did. My first chance to vote in '04 I voted for Mr. Ralph Nader. Plus Kentucky was sure to go to Bush so it didn't really hurt Kerry anyway.

2006-11-12 08:52:02 · answer #8 · answered by Mountain_Warrior 2 · 1 0

I would vote for a 4th 5th 6th party as well.

2006-11-12 08:55:19 · answer #9 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 2 0

Yes. Maybe a Libertarian, or some other Goldwater type conservative.

2006-11-12 08:52:30 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers