Discuss.
And thumbs up to the first person to name the author of that quote.
2006-11-12 08:33:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Sociology
I don't know who said it, but he/she is barking up the wrong tree. One has nothing to do with the other.
This statement, to me, means that women in search of higher learning are possibly gay???? Good Lord, that's ridiculous.
2006-11-12 17:43:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why women have to be restricted to either/or. A woman can be intelligent, scholarly, as well as being sexy and sure of her sexuality. The quote is probably from the 19th century
2006-11-12 12:26:29 · answer #2 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that may have been Sigmund Freud. He wasn't sure of his, either.
I think that is no more true than to say the same about a man being scholarly.
Does putting you're brain cells to use kill you're hormones? ( Tee, hee )
They have been calling women who are driven lesbian for years.
But there are no complaints about them bringing home the paycheck, right?
2006-11-12 09:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by smoothsoullady 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
some old man told me i was a scholar when i was a cahsier. I asked if it was good and he said no because I was a woman..wth does that mean.?
2006-11-12 16:36:20 · answer #4 · answered by jennyve25 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the field of study – and the questions one would be asked.
2006-11-12 08:47:22 · answer #5 · answered by ★Greed★ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nietzsche of course
2006-11-12 08:46:21 · answer #6 · answered by gobber 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing to discuss. It's horse****. Sounds like something Ann Coulter would have said.
2006-11-12 08:42:54 · answer #7 · answered by Christina D 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
ok, i think it's due to the fact that there would be little time for her to take time to herself. a normal girl/woman go take an hour to groom herself down there and whatnot, whereas a scholar only showers and hits the books. no?
2006-11-12 08:46:05 · answer #8 · answered by Eryc 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋