What was once known as GREAT BRITAIN
2006-11-12 23:55:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by . 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Surely England qualifies as the first, in a weird sort of way? Oliver Cromwell and the interegnum? Cromwell and the New Model Army get the drop on Charles I and chop said king's head off. Parliament, in various weird flavours, is then set to running the country. Democracy, of a sort, is thus invented. But Cromwell, a devout puritan, leads England into such bible-soaked dullness that after his death the populace find the dead king's son, Charles II, and pop him on the throne, whence he declares "party!!!!" and all get drunk and sh*g a lot. The Merry Monarch, he was called.
2006-11-12 08:11:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by wild_eep 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I will answer with a question knowing where your agenda really lies. If a person was bleeding to death on the street would you walk by or help them? So with a country such a Iraq with a genocidal, mass murdering (put aside the missing WMDs)dictator in power should have the world walked by or helped them?
2006-11-13 18:28:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jay 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The most recent elected dictatorship I know of is right here in UK. Margaret Thatcher, former Conservative prime minister for UK once described government in UK as an elected dictatorship. She was right. Tony Blair is an elected dictator. Heil.
2006-11-16 04:00:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOT Nicaragua;
Ortega lead a democraticaly elected government in the 80s which replaced a dictator who had USA support and Ortega has been democratically elected again
2006-11-14 00:06:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by georgieporgie2005uk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can america of a criticize the U.S.? They murdered 20 million of their own people, allowed hundreds of thousands of others to starve to death, and no person have been given to vote. meanwhile, your assertion that "the overpowering majority" of blacks would desire to not vote in the 1920s and Thirties and that 15% of the country would desire to not vote is only not authentic. First, the 15% variety is a present day variety. the proportion grew to become into not a similar eighty 5 years in the past. 2d, in basic terms blacks who lived in Jim Crow states weren't allowed to vote, and this grew to become into not even on the edge of "the overpowering majority." third, a lot of people in america of a have been against the Jim Crow regulations, and their existence grew to become into debated and contested, something the U.S. could rarely enable. Fourth, the undeniable fact that blacks have been slaves "previously that" is irrelevant on your assessment, exceedingly because of the undeniable fact that only approximately ALL Russians have been slaves previously the 1860s, inspite of shade, and due to the undeniable fact that slavery grew to become into, rightfully so, overturned. I comprehend that some blacks did not get to vote. That sucked. nonetheless sucks. Thank God for the Civil Rights pass... a pass that occurred interior u . s ., not Russia, related to the two white and black people. yet get your information at present day previously you're making a lame, statistical historic past argument. It makes you look incredibly bigoted and dumb.
2016-10-21 23:29:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
historically dictatorships didn't allow votes so you must be referring to recent governments (ie in the last 50 years), otherwise, dictatorship is something that is taken not voted in.
2006-11-12 08:15:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nicuragua, last week Daniel Ortega.
2006-11-12 08:08:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by jerofjungle 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
W.O. doing any research Nicaragua is the only one I can think off at this time,
2006-11-12 08:18:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by jim ex marine offi, 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
all leaders are dictatorial.
all politicians are wankas.
2006-11-16 07:51:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋