Wouldn't he just nuke the entire Middle East? Come on people! He doesn't care about American lives, he cares about Iraqi's!
2006-11-12 07:13:54 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Steve J, we would just take our troops out, and if anyone had beef....BOOM!
2006-11-12 07:18:59 · update #1
oh, i understand the power of a nuke more than most people, that is why we will use a hydrogen bomb, instead of an atom bomb to be more efficient
2006-11-12 07:31:07 · update #2
Hey! People, i was kidding, but it kind of makes you wonder, on how libs talk about Bush, that Bush is no where near as bad as they say..hmmm
2006-11-12 07:32:44 · update #3
Aren't you glad you had a choice as to where you were born, unlike all the innocent civilians that a nuclear strike would kill. I may not be a big Bush supporter but you and your first responder need to grow up and realize nukes kill indiscriminately, not just those in power.
2006-11-12 07:20:47 · answer #1 · answered by Bob D 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
wow. NO! turning the middle east into a sheet of glass is not the way to do things. Doing that would also murder every one of our 140-145,000 troops there right now. And all of the world would hate America after that. Nukes are not the way to go.
logger, even if we evacuated all of our troops...what about the innocent life? You obviously don't understand the power of a nuke. If we bombed Iraq, the blast would spill over into Syria and Iran, and west of Iraq into Jordan, and it would completely obliterate all of the countries with a "stan" in its name.
2006-11-12 15:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He cares about Ameican lives. He just makes very bad descisions sometimes and one of them being the Iraq War. And why would he care more abou Iraqs? I think he could care less about them, as he does not rule their country and he is not close to anyone over there. In every war, American lives are lost, so are you saying that every American president who has gotten us involved in a war does not care about us? No, they just have the best interests in mind. You may no agree with me, but this seems evident.
2006-11-12 15:27:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this war is not about stabilizing Iraq or much of any thing except to protect Israel, where have you people been ? we were friends with Iraq and Sadam until George Sr, became president and when Sadam complained about the Bushes stealing his oil
George Sr, got real hostile, and Sadam became public enemy no, 1 , What better excuse could old George get. how soon we forget, there have been one hell of a lot more people killed in Iraq , since America invaded than in the past 20 years under sadams tour of duty,
2006-11-12 15:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, that's a great idea. Better yet, why don't we just bomb every country on the other side of the Atlantic so that we can have this place all to ourselves. Then we won't have to worry about anyone refusing to kiss our a****. *
*sarcasm
2006-11-12 15:37:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get it right, he does not care about Iraqis He is buddies with the Saudis. As far as nuking the entire Middle East, there is no profit in that.
2006-11-12 15:18:52 · answer #6 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
are you out of your ******* mind? what your suggesting is genocide, since when did america turn into the fourth reich?
this is why people hate america, people like you honestly beleive your superior to the rest of the world. (not all americans, just people like you)
2006-11-12 15:24:25 · answer #7 · answered by impeachrob 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are so wrong about this president on oh so many levels. But then again your question alone shows your lack of intelligence and understanding.
2006-11-12 15:24:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Right out of Nero's playbook. Real nice, bet God'd be really proud of you.
2006-11-12 15:25:24 · answer #9 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
honestly, i dont think bush cares about how people die in this little debacle. all he really cares about at this point it pinning all the blame on dems and then leaving office w/o a scandal.
2006-11-12 15:19:08 · answer #10 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋