Should the hard workers support the lazy?
Should Oprah be president?
2006-11-12 06:36:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Most wealthy people give to charities.
Hard working people should not have to support the lazy.
And Oprah needs to quit bragging about herself all the time and just go away.
2006-11-12 06:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by Dovahkiin 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No not particularly. If people have worked hard for their money they should be free to use it in any way they want. I object to lazy good for nothings inheriting vast fortunes from rich parents and then wasting them. A lot of really wealthy people support charities and the like. As to Oprah being president I always knew the Americans were a bit odd so why not. It would be yet another puppet in the top job.
2006-11-12 06:45:11 · answer #2 · answered by david c 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do you assume that because someone is wealthy that they are hard workers. Most of the wealthy people in this country inherited theirs, they didn't work for it.
Most wealthy people donate money to charities to reduce their tax burden, their are very few who give just to give.
I do not believe that hard workers should support the lazy. I do however believe that the fortunate should lend a hand to those less fortunate.
Oprah fro president? No, I don't think so. Oprah lost me when she called Condi her "Girlfriend"
2006-11-12 07:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by Black Dragon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean by lazy? Less fortunate and lazy are two very different things, Sweetie. First of all, the wealthy tend to care for themselves anyway so sharing the wealth is not in one of their daily planners. The laziest people tend to be wealthy. Hard laborers who actually "work" to earn money should not be called lazy. Oprah can only be President if she is qualified.
2006-11-12 06:59:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i do not recognize the position to commence with you. First, if we are the richest us of a contained in the international, that doesn't MAKE US A CHARITY. second, WE commerce with international places for both our advantages or provide help, yet we do not immigrate them to reason social complications at residing house. third, immigration isn't in holding with how a lot a us of a has or that is GDP. It relies upon on the desires of the rustic, and that i do not see the position we favor 100 million over each and every twenty years to chop back unemployment. for each American that not has a shot on the yank dream, attempt convincing us that bringing extra a lot less fortunate people into our society and paying to help them in each and every way is the answer and we are racists. And next, what do you mean not welcoming, there is 4 million Mexicans a three hundred and sixty 5 days, and the present bill demands extinguishing our soverienty of our southern border and givng it to Mexico to enable them settle on what and the thanks to do it - We provide up our good to look after ourselves, the Most worthy us of a contained in the international - without the specific written permission from the President of Mexico. we've 2 presidents now. So, formerly you hail on colonization, you'll more effective be honest - tell Mexico to open their borders wide open so 40 to 60 million white and black individuals can colonize their us of a similar to they do. we are disillusioned because we haven't any administration over the inhabitants contained in the u . s . or the colonization and the returning of states to Mexico, there's no thanks to give up it, and our leaders do not care. We get it. individuals suck around the realm, and now they're going to take our land for it by majority inhabitants vote. and also you ask your self why we don't love it?
2016-11-29 01:55:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when were the wealthy ever hard workers? People don't get wealthy because of talent or hard work, they get wealthy because of social connections.
Oprah wouldn't be the worst choice we could make.
2006-11-12 09:54:57 · answer #6 · answered by Good Times, Happy Times... 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most wealthy people donate many thousands to charity. Oprah is one of them who happens to be extremely generous. I don't think we even know just how generous she is. Also I doubt that Oprah wants to be president. But I bet she would be a good one. Probably better than any we've ever had.
2006-11-12 06:40:00 · answer #7 · answered by papricka w 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If the poor person is poor because they do not work, they should not get benefits.
If the poor person at least works 20 or more hours, then yes, they should be helped.
Lazy people should not be helped. Earning a living is due to your work effort, whether you are a Hollywood actress or a burger flipper at McDonalds.
2006-11-12 08:09:36 · answer #8 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WE should all help where we can. Oprah is too use to having her own way to be president!
2006-11-12 06:38:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They get taxed pretty heavily and that helps the less fortunate, if they want to donate on top of that then it's their choice but I don't think it should be required
2006-11-12 06:38:09 · answer #10 · answered by goldengirl 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋