pull out of Iraq?

I know it's sad but the answer is yes. The articles of impeachment have already been filed in a Federal Court. Bush himself said to the Iraqi people.. Bush speaking after elections "does this election mean we are going to leave Iraq, no it does not". Look at the 18-29 vote numbers. They turned the tide in many races all over America. A full 2 million more young people voted this election than did in 2002. According to CNN exit polls 60 percent of voters younger than 30 cast ballots for Democrats. These people are not stupid. Look at the number one issue on voters minds. It was Iraq. Robert Gates will not go against Bush. Also consider this, In both Iraq and Afghanistan the USA has built permanent bases. They were built to protect the flow of oil. The only option is Bush's removal from office. It's sad I know. The neocons would not make the mistake of a "unprecedented period of cooperation" it's not the way they ran the Congress for the past 6 years. They gave legislation to the Democrats at the last minute before a vote was called. They never once gave a inch on any issue. Even forced "filler busters" in the Senate and threatened the nuke option. I think Democrats want leaders who lead. Leading is not about taking a vote with the opposed party on a decision. Bush's words "we earned capital in this election and we intend to spend it". He was speaking of the 2004 election which he Defeated John Kerry. Democrats would be unwise not to spend the capital they earned in 2006. Democrats can not spend that capital on there agenda if they can't get past Bush's veto power. Democrats also can not spend that capital if they can not stop the filler buster in the Senate. Leogirl, BTW, have you read the articles of impeachment, there is ample evidence there, read them. They have been filed in Federal Court. BTW, William E, where were you when Clinton was impeached? Read up on that one.

2006-11-12 06:39:38 · answer #1 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋

I see jake anyone who has mention pull out of Iraq they got the thumb down. Not American here. I don't agree with American troops in Iraq. Most Europeans feel that the USA is a kind of bully imposing there sytem on others. Plus the saying during the Iraq conflict was would USA invade China because they have occupied Tibet? silly me forgot there no oil in Tibet. What cause the anti usa in Iraq was the ill treatment of prisoneers in Iraq the abuse etc. It was just as bad as the Nazi during the war.

2006-11-12 15:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋

No. Exactly the opposite. Increase troop numbers significantly. Take them on there and this time FIGHT TO WIN. No wishy-washy crap. Make the offensive so huge that other countries (Iran, N. Korea etc.) will think twice before continuing their little mind games.

2006-11-12 14:57:15 · answer #3 · answered by Cinner 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋

We should pull out of Iraq once things get better, but they are far from good. Hopefully under Gates we will see Iraq strategy altered, and a win on the horizon

2006-11-12 14:24:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋

I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU PEOPLE!!!!

You can't just go into a country and overturn the govt and throw out the crazy ruler and leave the country to put itself back together! The country would fall into chaos and another psychotic ruler would take charge and the same thing would happen. We have to help them structure their new govt and get them all set up before we leave. HELLO?!?!?

2006-11-13 01:17:57 · answer #5 · answered by twinny2323 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

The Israeli lobby is taken Americans to Iran war next before leaving Iraq war. Americans are trapped by every on to see their end as a world power Iraq is USA Afghanistan. Its to be or not to be even the UK want to see that day .

2006-11-12 14:25:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋

To answer your question, no. When the US 'pulls out' it only serves to empower the terrorists, and encourage further actions. Pay me now, or pay me later. I say draw them all to Iraq, and take them on there.

2006-11-12 14:22:10 · answer #7 · answered by jh 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋

if enough men had pulled out sooner, Iraq wouldn't exist right now

2006-11-12 14:30:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋

Troops say we shouldn't. And the troops know what is going on better than we do, so I agree with them

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/05/AR2006110500770.html

2006-11-12 14:28:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋

No. Go on the offensive you have to fight to win. It may be ugly but victory is the only option.

2006-11-12 14:24:05 · answer #10 · answered by just curious 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋

17 answers