Why will the USA cut and run from Iraq?

Answer 1

Iraq war was never the USA must war it was an Israeli lobby war and so is the next war look how many Americans got killed and how much money spent on Iraq war and finally we all found out the war was never an American national interests war

Answer 2

The USA is not going to cut and run we will go in a new direction one in which there will be changes expected on the Iraq end of things we can not continue to police the country. There has to be a time table that the Iraq people will be able to handle their own and not rely on the united states, else we may as well have took over the country on our own and left the iraq people out with us just running the whole country

Answer 3

Did the USA ever have a goal of owning Iraq? Congress gave Bush the power to invade and depose Saddam. They did not give Bush the Power to occupy Iraq as it's owner. Congress also has never declared war. "cut and run" does not apply.

Answer 4

Since you are quoting a Bush phrase, and since he will now have to work with the Democrats on solving the Iraq dilemma, I seriously doubt the USA will simply cut and run. The politicians will work out a timetable to withdraw since so much is at stake in Iraq.

Answer 5

It appears like 30 years after the shown truth that leaving Vietnam replaced into the right determination. analyze it to places that we fought and did not go away like Guantanamo. Germany Japan Korea I keep in mind that holding bases all around the realm is solid employer. yet once you analyze Vietnam to Korea i imagine leaving worked out more effective than staying. a tremendous Joint rigidity Base in Basra can be a very good idea. protect a army presence to guard the oil tankers. and Air potential waiting to scramble. alongside with a Predator drone operation Hub. it would want to enable the military to go away Saudi Arabia Halliburton might want to get the settlement to both construct the Basra base in Southern Iraq. this can make corrupt politicians satisfied. And Halliburton might want to decontaminate the Saudi bases after the military left. because the Saudis imagine folk as disgusting pigs shall we favor to sparkling the sand after we left. This defeats AlQuida's best argument that American Infidels are on Holy floor (Saudi Arabia) Defeats the U. S. occupation of Iraq argument. facilitates the authorities to not "reduce-N-Run" even as mutually it keeps a presence to guard the Oil investments. Win Win concern

Answer 6

The USA cannot if it has any conscience. Having invaded the country it owes it to the ordinary Iraqis to stay until the country is as stable as possible. This is such a difficult job because Iraqis are killing Iraqis. It is not a question of them trying to get rid of the "invaders" it is a struggle for power. This is where the dual standards of the people come in. It is a conflict not of Iraq v USA but fundamentalists and more moderate moslems.

Answer 7

The GOP is there, not the USA. I don't have to identify with what a chickenhawk punk does in my name.

I'm glad I'm an American and not a Republican.

Answer 8

Actually I heard both democrats and republicans discuss adding more troops not less to iraq. I guess we will see.

Answer 9

The war against terror was in Afganistan, that still hasn.t been won. The war in Iraq has been won because all it was, was a payback to Hussien for embarrising his daddy, Bush the first. That job has been completed.

Answer 10

We can't.
It will embolden the terrorists and make us look like cowards/liberals/french.