2006-11-12 04:09:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That will be up to the international community to do. Stay tuned.
2006-11-12 04:22:55 · answer #1 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be fair, first of all, Mr. Ramsefeld did not commit all the
crimes and torture. If he condones to such practices
and orders his subordinates to do so then I readily
agree that he should be on trial as if he himself actually
took part, like Hitler or for that matter some of the Japanese war criminals.
2006-11-12 13:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Was Mr ramsefield the warden? Donald Rumsfeld was not in either place when the crimes were committed, so he could not have done them.
2006-11-12 12:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. I have always felt that the best thing for the country would be if we put Mr. Ramsefield in a trail.
Love jack
2006-11-12 12:51:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
dont you mean the secretary of defense donald rumsfeld? he should be right along side the soldiers who did the crimes because they will do the time. if he were to face charges bush would give him amesty. he didnt tell those soldiers to beat and torment those prisoners but i dont suppose he said very much after it happened do you?
2006-11-12 12:14:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think you mean Rumsfeld and trial.
Finish Jr. High, then repost
2006-11-12 12:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by Abu 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Can you vote in your own country?
You should take care of your own.
Afraid to?
2006-11-12 12:15:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Very stupid uninformed question
2006-11-12 12:12:33 · answer #8 · answered by smatthies65 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
you say "all" can you name one?
2006-11-12 12:15:17 · answer #9 · answered by razeumright 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WTF??
2006-11-12 12:13:14 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋