Democrats have said what they need to say for years in order to in. Look at the history of this election going back over a year. Using the media they berated the administration, every republican who failed, and the war. Then in the last 30 days they found "God," lower taxes, support for the troops and got themselves elected.
2006-11-12 03:23:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by netjr 6
·
2⤊
6⤋
The moderates won this election for the Democrats. The Independent and moderate votes were the keys to the mid-terms. We voted for GW in 2000, about half of us decamped in 2004 (which is why the vote was so close), and by the mid-terms of 2006 we were fed up with the ineptness and hypocrisy of the Republican machine and this horrific mess in Iraq. Extremism on either side turns us off, whether it's a far left Democrat or an extreme right wing Republican.
2006-11-12 04:38:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals have only ever been a small percentage of the Democratic party. The image of Democrats all being Liberal was created by Republicans. Some Dems may be Liberal on certain issues and Conservative on others. Issues should be taken on merit, rather than what the party says. There are some Liberal leaner's that head committees and it will be interesting to see what happens between them and the more moderate majority.
And when I say Liberal I do not mean the true definition, I mean as defined by Dem opponents.
2006-11-12 03:22:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Truth Erector 3
·
6⤊
1⤋
No, in case you listened intently, people did not a lot include the republicans yet were attempting to deliver a message to the democrats that they weren't satisfied. I imagine many have grow to be apologetic about balloting for the republicans now. i replaced into by no potential an Obama supporter yet i can say what the republicans are attempting to do to this us of a, reduce medicare, social protection and different entitlements even as giving the wealthy yet another tax reduce is despicable. Entitlements are payed for by the individuals, look on you pay stub now and again, they take the money good out of your paycheck. perhaps they ought to stop playing with that funds that doesn't belong to them contained in the first position and then the money might want to be there even as people retire.
2016-11-29 01:47:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, they are. but liberalism is not just a way to win elections. it is a way of thinking and living and letting live.
non-politicians can be liberal and not care about if it is popular or not. not everybody is a politician.
if the system works, then when the number of liberal persons
( voters ) outnumbers the conservative voters, then the liberals will win elections. Until then you may be conservative or liberal as you choose and let the ruling majority rule like a good sport. that is democratic.
2006-11-12 03:22:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You better look again. The Northeast liberals made the Democratic wave.
2006-11-12 12:29:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm going to answer this question honestly. The notion that conservative Democrats were the prevailing wind in this year's mid-terms is utterly false, but the GOP and the main stream media are promoting this idea because the are simply afraid to admit that Bush's policies have caused a wholesale backlash against conservatism in general.
Here are a couple of examples - conservative Democrats did well in conservative states: Tester in Montanan, Webb in Virginia, for instance. However, the most conservative of all Dems this year, Harold Ford, Jr., actually lost his red state challenge. There was a perception that he was too much like the GOP. Joe Lieberman's victory was not about his policies, but his seniority. Lamont would have been a back bench member of the Senate and Connecticut is a tiny state with limited power. Giving up Joe would have cost them big.
Surprisingly, liberal Democrats like Sherrod Brown did very well in red states. The city and county of Dallas, one of the most conservative places on earth, elected a ton of Dems and even through majority support behind the liberal candidate for governor.
Check your facts again. This election was about "anti-Bush." Not about liberal vs. conservative.
2006-11-12 03:20:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by texascrazyhorse 4
·
7⤊
4⤋
NIce attempt to tow the repub party line and divert attention away from the fact that Bush Co. is in seriously deeper poo now.
2006-11-12 03:51:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by LatexSolarBeef 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
HAAAA!! Oh that is funny. I think it is the othet way around. The Republicans are going Democrat. Look at Arnold in California. He appealed to the Dems. So did the rest of them.
Wow you people really are delusional.
2006-11-12 03:27:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gettin_by 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
Almost all the New Democrats ran as Republicans.
They fooled the Independents and Undecided.
UNLESS, they really are Republicans at heart.
I Dont Trust Them.
I think it was all a trick planned by the DNC.
I'll bet they'll turn out to be the same old commie pinkos.
2006-11-12 03:17:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋