Argument for: 1) A parent (in this case, mother) has more time to nurture and care for the children. She can spend more time helping them with their homework and preparing them for their place in the world.
2) The mother has more time to prepare nutritious meals for her family. She can put more thought in to the variety of meals and presentation of food. She could spend time to provide a comfortable home for her family.
3) Not being so haggard at the end of the day from working and then looking after her motherly duties when getting home, she will most likely looking forward to time with her husband and sex.
4) The mother could spend more time in educating her children in her and her husbands values and culture.
Against
1) A women is a person and an individual with interests other than ONLY looking after a family and has the right as a human being to persue those interests.
2) It could be boring for the woman to be alone during the day without other ADULT humans to interact with.
3) Maybe the women hates to cook and clean. Men get to pursue a particular occupation. A women shouldn't be stuck with cooking and cleaning as her only choice. And just because she doesn't like to cook and clean doesn't mean she doesn't want to enjoy the benefits of a family just the way a man gets to enjoy the benefits of a family without cooking and cleaning.
4) The mother can be a more interesting partner to her husband by having interests and education outside of the home.
2006-11-12 01:54:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by makingthisup 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
FOR:
With unborn children being developed in a woman's womb, the bond between mother and child is powerful (and far stronger than a father's connection). Therefore, it makes perfect sense that a mother continue and foster this relationship following birthing ... her child will benefit greatly. Consider the number of females who enter the nursing profession and it is obvious that women are far better suited to caring than males.
AGAINST:
A women's place is in the home is old-school thinking. Far more women are entering and succeeding in the workplace and working at atypical jobs (eg: construction, science and technology). (note - it would strengthen your argument to cite some type of statistic here ... eg: according to Statistics Canada, over 73% of new mothers returned to work after childbirth in 2005 alone). Should a woman possess the necessary skills, interests and apitudes, there are absolutely no reasons why she should not pursue her career. The husband can stay at home and care for a child, the child could be placed in daycare or a qualified nanny/housekeeper could be hired.
2006-11-12 01:55:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cook,clean and look after the kids. now--days all the works shareable by men also. So there is no need for arguement all the male are shareing and helping.Donot make this as a issue. When money needed,both are going for employement both has to share the work. Women are helping more to their spouses.
Time is changeing, everything is changeins, cverybody understands., there is no discussion and enligten things
2006-11-12 13:39:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ar.samy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some men are actually better at cooking, cleaning, and looking after the children. It is a situation that has been debated time after time, but in each case it has to be a decision on what is the best for all parties involved, including the man, woman, and children. Good luck to you.
2006-11-12 01:37:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by livewire 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Family planning measures i.e contraceptives etc have a very major effect on women. Now she can decide when to have a child. It has given her control over her life.
The fact that she is to bear child and to bring him up in initial years remains same. Unlike men who have very clear role women are striving to find a balance between life as a house-maker and her career. Some women are opting for having children early bring them up for initial years and then take a jump in career while others are concenterating on career and then later on they choose motherhood. The choice is with women.
These days she has to do both. The men have to chip in and support them. So it is not case of either or but of both. We have to help them to find balance.
2006-11-12 02:11:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by krafts_india 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Firstly no. But if she has no further scent of education, she has to do willingly this hilarious job. What is wrong in it. Why to look down at this? Just like a labour who works in Gulf, away from family, for a paltry sum, irregular payment, undergoing tension and risk of life too in his field of work. Life is like that. Or a woman to sit in sofa, costly dresses on particularly aimed at exhibitionism, heavily perfumed and ornamented, people around to serve tea and coffee, besides baby sitter for the children! What is the use of this life. The first one is not far better? salutes to her. The early morning signal to get awake made by the domestic **** is i think for the lady referred first.
2006-11-12 03:19:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by RAVINDRAN K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
and then he needs intercourse good? ignore that. Do on your guy in basic terms what you prefer to do. or you will in basic terms finally end up bitter. i become informed as quickly as, on no account do something the 1st twelve months of marriage which you do not plan on doing for something of your existence. he will assume it, then once you provide up, he thinks you're having an affair or something. merely provide up and circulate on strike. make certain you attempt to chat to him first. final motel earlier leaving is counseling. have faith me that is not going to get to any extent further effective every time quickly. sounds such as you're on my own even even with the undeniable fact which you persist with him. I had a relationship like that once. he's my EX! He become a narcissist, look it up. you will see a definition of your husband there.
2016-11-23 17:00:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by mr.bhagchand 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is nothing shameful about staying at home and raising your kids but in realty in todays world it just does't work for everyone. some companies do not offer family health insurance like my husbands. he had to pay over $400 a month each for my son and me. a lot of companies are doing away with pension plans also. i went back to work so that we could afford to send our son to college
2006-11-12 01:39:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Diana K 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In actual it is great job and not easy to manage by men but some modren women feel it is cheap, they r wrong
2006-11-12 01:39:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sonu Raja 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In reality, this is a noble job and responsibility. Only stupid liberals and feminists find it degrading.
Bear in mind that we had a great country when women weren't so contentious.
2006-11-12 01:31:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋