2006-11-12 01:26:39 · 8 answers · asked by jenny 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Yes.
If we don't allow some aspects of it, our behaviour and decisions will be guided by speculation and superstition.
It's like the biological equivalent of flat-earth thinking. "Don't sail West across the great ocean because you'll fall off the edge of the earth." As it turned out Columbus didn't and the rest, as they say, is history.
I'm sure a lot of people have suffered in the process of exploration, but unless we continue to explore and take risks human existence is doomed.
Dangerous knowledge is better than blind superstition.
2006-11-12 05:06:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello,
This is a good guide with a step-by-step method to get your hair back http://hairagain.toptips.org
Male hair loss is the most common type of hair loss.It's caused by increased sensitivity to male sex hormones (androgens) in certain parts of the scalp, and is passed on from generation to generation. There are many factors that can attribute to hair recession or massive hair fall. You can try to regain your full head of healthy hair by following natural methods: they are cheaper, they have no side effect and very often more effective than conventional one.
As said above an interesting guide you can follow to get your hair back and prevent future hair loss without dangerous chemicals and drugs, and without expensive supplements or painful hair transplants is available on this site: http://hairagain.toptips.org
2014-09-24 13:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I believe it should be. The advantages to the health of individuals out weighs the fears of the paranoid. It should be allowed for those who have lost function of organs. Eyes, teeth, digits, even small vanities like hair for some healthy bald boy who is able or willing to pay for the procedure. Ask those who suffer severe illness, like M.S. diabetes, or a liver disease, they would answer "yes". Should I suffer such a fate and the cloning of part of my body could save me? You're darn right I would have it!
2006-11-12 09:42:38 · answer #3 · answered by the old dog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it is okay to clone an entire human being. BUT-in the case of burn victims. I believe it is okay to use their DNA to replicate their skin to use to repalace what was injured. I think it is okay to use cloning to replace your own failing major organs.
2006-11-12 09:36:43 · answer #4 · answered by ne11 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
human cloning should not be done
2006-11-12 09:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by tanner 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not on this earth! Never Ever!
2006-11-12 09:47:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its the best way to produce spare parts
2006-11-12 09:44:01 · answer #7 · answered by instantanything 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
2006-11-12 09:33:58 · answer #8 · answered by mommymanic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋