it it as good as it looks?because it looke VERY interesting.
2006-11-11 23:47:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Don't bother. I don't know where they got there information from but the film is a very suuped up, historically incorrect mistake! They must have had a low budget and a bunch of disillusioned morons writing the script. Dont take it seriously. If i can comment positively on anything it's that it's quite a 'pretty' film.
2006-11-12 01:23:23 · answer #1 · answered by blue_butterfly 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because the reviews I have seen and heard say its not very good. She has missed the fact that Marie would have been groomed from birth to be a queen she was not some innocent pleb.outsider. She has made the film ahistorical. Simple otherwise.
Basically Sofia has not her fathers talent. But as we live it times when looking right, acting right and having the right 'connections' matter more, there she is.
Lost in Translation' made we cry for Bill Murray. A waste of his talent.
2006-11-11 23:55:26 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I haven't seen the movie "Marie Antoinette." However, I am patiently waiting for the DVD to come out so that I can see it. I am a HUGE fan of Kirsten Dunst.
2006-11-12 00:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by Louise Smith 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i want to, but i think it's very weird how she chose american actors to portray marie antoinette and louis XVI. personally, i think she could have chosen a better actor than jason schwartzman to be louis xvi.
2006-11-12 00:26:58 · answer #4 · answered by stitchfan85 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah its a good movie.
Wife thought was fantastic, but im a guy what would i know!
lol
2006-11-11 23:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet ............
but i hope to c
2006-11-12 00:03:24 · answer #6 · answered by Tareq 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋